Special Issue: Child Protection Vocabulary in Professional Judgement – Fit for Purpose?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/gswr.v2i2.1327Keywords:
Vocabulary, Child Protection, Safeguarding, Co-Production, Professional JudgementAbstract
N/aReferences
Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S. Thompson, K., Pithouse, A. and Davey, D. (2010) ‘Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children’s Services’. British Journal of Social Work. 40. pp352-370.
Calder, M. C. and Archer, J. (2016) Risk in Child Protection. Assessment in Childcare. Great Britain. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
De Bortoli, L., Ogloff, J., Coles, J. and Dolan, M. (2017) ‘Towards best practice: combining evidence-based research, structured assessment and professional judgement’. Child & Family Social Work. 22. pp660-669.
DeGuerre, K., Strolin-Goltzman, J., Briar-Lawson, K. and Gooley, B. (2021) ‘Child Neglect: Statutes, Rates, and a Neglect Diversion Model’. Greenwich Social Work Review. 2. 2.
Fanner, M. and Evans, D. T. (2021) ‘Problematising young male victims in twenty-first century English child sexual exploitation policy: A critical discourse analysis’ Greenwich Social Work Review. 2. 2.
Helm, D. (2016) ‘Sense-making in a social work office: an ethnographic study of safeguarding judgements. Child & Family Social Work. 21(1). p26-35.
Howard, S. (2021) ‘Defining child exposure to domestic violence: Lessons from a historical review of the literature’. Greenwich Social Work Review. 2. 2.
Nyathi, N. (2018) ‘Child protection decision-making: social workers’ perceptions’. . Journal of Social Work Practice. 32(2). p189-203.
Pentaris, P. and Oresanya, A., (2021) ‘Child protection vocabulary in the Children Act 1989: Power, ambiguity and heterogeneity’. Greenwich Social Work Review. 2. 2.
Taylor, C. and White. S (2001) ‘Knowledge, Truth and Reflexivity. The Problem of Judgement in Social Work’. Journal of Social Work. 1(1). pp37-59.
