Pre-university informal engagement with mathematical activities and the decision to study mathematics at university

Katie Steckles, Peter Rowlett, Angharad Ugonna

Abstract


A survey was created to investigate the experiences of mathematics undergraduates with informal mathematical activity prior to starting university, and links these with the decision to study mathematics. A questionnaire was completed by a small sample of first-year undergraduates at two UK universities. Generally, incoming undergraduates are shown to have a high level of enjoyment of mathematics and engagement with informal mathematical activity. Popular activities included mathematical puzzles and games, and online videos about maths. Students were often engaged with family or via social media, playing computer, tablet or phone games, watching TV game shows with mathematical aspects and participating in organised competitions. Only around half engaged via talks or workshops organised through school and watching more structured documentaries or videos of lectures. Few participated in organised clubs. It seems there was greater engagement with ‘fun’ aspects of mathematics than with activities which demonstrate mathematics linked to career choice. The link to goals of outreach and similar initiatives is discussed, with further research indicated.


Keywords


outreach; university; engagement; informal learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archer, L., DeWitt, J. and Osborne, J., 2013. ASPIRES: Young people’s science and career aspirations, ages 10-14. London: King’s College London.

Cooper, S., 2011. An Exploration of the Potential for Mathematical Experiences in Informal Learning Environments. Visitor Studies, 14(1), pp.48-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2011.557628

Denson, C.D., Stallworth, C.A., Hailey, C. and Householder, D.L., 2015. Benefits of Informal Learning Environments: A Focused Examination of STEM-based Program Environments. Journal of STEM Education, 16 (1), pp.11-15.

Hofkins, D., 2017. Understanding Participation rates in post-16 Mathematics and Physics (UPMAP). Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/research-projects/2019/may/understanding-participation-rates-post-16-mathematics-and-physics-upmap [Accessed 10 January 2020].

IMA [Institute of Mathematics and its Applications], 2012. Maths Outreach Report. Available at: https://cdn.ima.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/National-HE-STEM-Programme-Maths-Outreach-Report.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Johnson, A. and Mulligan, C., 2016. What makes a successful outreach kit? MSOR Connections 14(2), pp.28-33. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v14i2.291

NCCPE [National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement], 2018. What is public engagement? Available at: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/about-engagement/what-public-engagement [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Robinson, M., Thomlinson, M.M. and Challis, N.V., 2010. Why do students study maths? In: M. Robinson, N. Challis & M. Thomlinson (Eds.), Maths at University: Reflections on experience, practice and provision, pp.8-18. Birmingham: More Maths Grads.

Rodd, M., Reiss, M. and Mujtaba, T., 2011. Undergraduates’ stories about why they are studying physics: implications for policy. Available at:

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/sites/ioe/files/BERA2011RoddReissMujtabaUPMAPpost18physicsS_2.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Smith, A., 2004. Making Mathematics Count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education. Available at:

http://www.mathsinquiry.org.uk/report/MathsInquiryFinalReport.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Stirling, D., 2009. Outreach to Schools: A Good Practice Guide. Birmingham: More Maths Grads. Available at: https://www.stem.org.uk/rxue2 [Accessed 10 January 2020].

University of Sheffield, 2019. Public engagement, outreach and widening participation. Available at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/pre/public-engagement/resources/toolkits/outreach [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Varner, J., 2014. Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science. BioScience, 64(4), pp.333-340. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v18i3.1048

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.