Non-mathematics undergraduates’ perceptions of mathematics and preferences for supporting digital learning resources in a technological university

Maryna Lishchynska, Seán Lacey, Declan O'Connor, Violeta Morari

Abstract


Service mathematics plays a central role in Munster Technological University (MTU) where the majority of programmes contain at least one mathematics or statistics module. The widely acknowledged issue of low engagement continues to be a barrier to learning for many non-mathematics undergraduates and often results in low achievement which may impact progression. One of the main goals of the SPIRIT Maths project at MTU is to gain insights into learners’ perceptions and dispositions towards mathematics and use that acumen to inform the development of digital learning tools and future interventions. This paper presents some of the findings of a student survey that focused on students’ expectations of and the realities of experiencing mathematics at university, and their views on remote delivery and approaches to learning. The survey results show that many incoming students overestimate the difficulties of studying mathematics at university. The data also highlight how a significant proportion of respondents spend an inadequate amount of time on independent learning. We then consider the aspects of mathematics that learners find most discouraging, and what students report could help them to better engage with and learn mathematics. We also explore students’ preferences for digital learning resources ranging from videos of worked solutions to an online bank of practice questions with feedback.


Keywords


learning mathematics, non-mathematics undergraduates, perceptions and dispositions, digital learning resources

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burns, S., 2020. Many students will struggle to find part-time jobs as costs drop only slightly.

Available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/many-students-will-struggle-to-find-part-time-jobs-as-costs-drop-only-slightly-1.4277400 [Accessed 20 August 2021].

Carroll, T., Casey, D., Crowley, J., Mulchrone, K. F. and Ní Shé, A., 2017. Numbas as an engagement tool for first-year Business Studies students. MSOR Connections, 15(2), pp.42-50. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v15i2.410

Chao, T., Chen, J. and Dede, C., 2016. Using Digital Resources for Motivation and Engagement in Learning Mathematics: Reflections from Teachers and Students. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2, pp.253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0024-6

Citizens Information, 2019. Overview of the Irish education system. Available at: https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/education/the_irish_education_system/overview_of_the_irish_education_system.html#startcontent [Accessed 4 January 2022].

Drumm, B. and Jong, A., 2020. A semester like no other: a student and lecturer perspective on the impact of Covid-19 on 3rd level academic life. AISHE-J: All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), pp.1-14. Available at: https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/487/833 [Accessed 9 May 2022].

Grehan, M., Mac an Bhaird, C. and O'Shea, A., 2016. Investigating students' levels of engagement with mathematics: critical events, motivations, and influences on behaviour. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(1), pp.1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1050706

Harris, D. and Pampaka, M., 2016. ‘They [the lecturers] have to get through a certain amount in an hour’: first year students’ problems with service mathematics lectures. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(3), pp.144-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw013

Herrmann, K. J., McCune, V. and Bager-Elsborg, A., 2017. Approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement: Results from a large scale, multi-level analysis. Högre utbildning, 7(1), pp.29-42. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v7.905

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. and Reiss, K., 2020. The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153 (Article 103897). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

Liston, M. and O'Donoghue, J., 2010. Factors influencing the transition to university service mathematics: part 2 a qualitative study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29(2), pp.53-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq005

Lyakhova, S., Oakes, D. and Joubert, M., 2021. Engaging with mathematics during Covid-19: students aged 16+ responding to a mathematics ‘Box Set’ of enrichment video materials. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 40(4), pp.277-295. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab023

Ní Fhloinn, E. and Carr, M., 2017. Formative assessment in mathematics for engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(4), pp.458-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1289500

Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B. and Besser, M., 2019. Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback's perceived usefulness and students' self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, pp.154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004

Rameli, M. R. M. and Kosnin, A. M., 2016. Challenges in mathematics learning: a study from school students' perspective. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321873178 [Accessed 10 December 2021].

Skilling, K., Bobis, J. and Martin, A. J., 2020. The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, pp.469-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2

Stacey, K., 2006. What is mathematical thinking and why is it important. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.550.1647&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 2 December 2021].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v20i2.1279

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.