Multimodal assessment and like for like feedback: What’s the point?

Danielle Tran

Abstract


At the University of Greenwich, United Kingdom, the Postgraduate Research Teaching and Learning and Assessment course (PGRTLA) sees a coming together of post-graduate research students (PGRs) from a variety of disciplines. The latter means that students have often developed distinct approaches to studying and assessment rooted in the subject area in which they specialise. The PGRTLA is a six-week course consisting of one three-hour interactive seminar each week. This case study evaluates a trial to submit a reflective assignment in a format of their choice. Students were also informed that the feedback given by the course leader would be ‘like for like’, meaning that the tutor would employ the same mode and format used by the student when constructing the feedback. Five of the 42 participants chose to submit a multimodal assessment. In spite of the low number of multimodal submissions, positive feedback was received via the course completion survey. Experiments with assessment and feedback show students that their different learning styles are respected; it offers students greater choice and control over the format and mode of their work. However, support for new technology-enhanced learning tools needs to be offered in advance for those interested in trying out something new. Training may also need to be offered to staff involved in marking multimodal assessments. Resource and time have shown to be challenging factors but such experimentation by student and teacher can lead to both parties developing their professional practice. Existing skills of familiar tools can be improved upon, and new skills can be learnt as new tools are tried out.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adobe Connect (2018) https://www.adobe.com/products/adobeconnect.html [accessed: 19 April 2018].

Blake, Caitrin (2015) Creating Memorable, Productive Assignments With Multimodal Composition, Professional Resources, Concordia University, https://online.cune.edu/multimodal-composition/ [accessed: 19 April 2018].

Brookhart, Susan M. (2017) How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students, Second Edition (Alexandria VA, USA: ASCD).

Crook, Anne, Alice Mauchline, Stephen Maw, Clare Lawson, Robyn Drinkwater, Karsten Lundqvist, Paul Orsmond, Stephen Gomez, Julian Park (2012) ‘The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?’, Computers & Education, 58: 1, pp. 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.025

McCormack, Coralie, and Mary-Jane Taylor (2006) ‘Electronic delivery of oral feedback on graphic design projects’,Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? ascilite, The University of Sydney [accessed: 19 April 2018] (Available at: http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p72.pdf).

Oldakowski, Tim (2014) ‘A Multimodal Assignment That Enriches Literacy Learning The Problem’, InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, Vol 9, pp. 70-77. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1035852.pdf [accessed: 19 April 2018].

Poulos, Ann, and Mary Jane Mahony (2008) ‘Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33:2, pp. 143-154 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602930601127869

Powtoon (2018) https://www.powtoon.com/home/ [accessed: April 19 2018].

Ragupathi, Kiruthika (2012) Using multimodal communications for critical thinking assessments, Technology in Pedagogy, No. 10, August 2012. Available at: https://blog.nus.edu.sg/cdtkdr/tag/multimodal-essays/ [accessed: April 19 2018].

Screencastify (2018) https://www.screencastify.com/ [accessed: 19 April 2018].

Weaver, Melanie R. (2006) Do students value feedback? Student perceptions

of tutors’ written responses, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31:3, 379-394, DOI:

1080/02602930500353061


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.