Capturing the student voice: creating more effective mechanisms for listening

Louise Naylor, Jack Lay, Chris Mattinson

Abstract


Having completed a review of their student representation system and committees, Kent Union has worked in partnership with the University to launch its first Education Strategy (2016-2020). A key objective of this strategy was to create the Kent Union Education and Student Representation Board, to be held regularly to discuss University-wide academic issues. With input from student/staff liaison committees and its Education Forum for student representatives and also by deploying a new online platform (Digital Rep) for gathering student feedback, Kent Union aims to provide an annual report to its Board of Trustees as well as the University, on key issues relating to the student experience.

To ensure that these mechanisms for capturing the student voice are heeded, the University has sought to align some of its own strategic priorities for education and the student experience with those of Kent Union and created more effective mechanisms for listening, by enhancing communication and feedback through its governance and operational structures to integrate better the University and Kent Union plans. In this case study, we have evaluated the initial impact of these changes on the ways in which the student voice informs educational enhancement from both student and staff perspectives.

 

 


Keywords


Student partnerhip Student Voice Student Engagement Student Representation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blair, E. and Noel, K.V. (2014) ‘Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard?’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879-894.

Bland, S., Millard, L., Bartholemew, P. and Chapman P. (2013) ‘Students as Partners: A three-layered approach to enhancement.’ In: Dunne, E. and Owen, D. (eds.) The student engagement handbook: practice in higher education. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Chapter 27, 477-491.

Bride, I., Naylor, L.H. and Tunaker, C. (2013) ‘The Creative Campus: Empowering the University Community to Change Spaces.’ In: Dunne, E. and Owen, D. (eds.) The student engagement handbook: practice in higher education. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Chapter 15, 255-269.

Brooman, S., Darwen, S. and Pimor, A. (2014) ‘The student voice in higher education curriculum design: is there value in listening?’ Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 52(6), 663-674.

Garwe (2015) ‘Student voice and quality enhancement in higher education.’ Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 385-399.

Gibbs,G. (2012) Implications of ‘Dimensions of Quality‘ in a market environment. HEA Research Series. York: HE Academy.

Healey, M., Bovill, C. and Jenkins, A. (2015) ‘Students as partners in learning.’ In: Lea, J. (ed.) Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education: Engaging with dimensions of practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Chapter 6, 141-172.

Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. (2016) ‘Students as Partners: Reflections on a Conceptual Model.’ Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1-13.

Little, S (2012) Staff-Student Partnerships in Higher Education. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Little, B., Locke, W., Scesa, A. and Williams, R. (2009). Report to HEFCE on student engagement. Bristol: HEFCE.

McPherson, N.G and Heggie, G. (2015) ‘Transitioning to Students as Partners, Producers, Collaborators and Co-creators. Are We Serious?’ Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education. Glasgow: QAA Enhancement Themes.

Thomas, L. (2012) Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the What works? Student retention & success programme. York: HE Academy.

Zhao, J. and Gallant, D.J. (2012) ‘Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: exploring the issues of validity and reliability.’ Assessment and Evaluation in Higher education 37(2), 227-235.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v3i2.528

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.