The Digital Classroom Project at the University of Kent

Silvia Colaiacomo

Abstract


The Digital Classroom Project at the University of Kent aimed to investigate the relationship between space, technology and pedagogy in two new seminar rooms equipped with special furniture and technology. A key aspect of the project was the close collaboration between academics, professional services and students. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data shows that both students and staff benefitted from working in these rooms and that the spaces allowed opportunities to experiment with new pedagogical approaches tailored on students needs.

Keywords


active learning, learning technologies, learning spaces, distributed leadership

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baik, C., and Greig, J. (2009), ‘Improving the academic outcomes of undergraduate ESL students: the case for discipline‐based academic skills programs’, in Higher Education Research and Development, 28:4.

Bovill, C., and Bulley, C.J. (2011), ‘A model of active student participation in curriculum design: exploring desirability and possibility’, in: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Student Learning (ISL) 18: Global Theories and Local Practices: Institutional, Disciplinary and Cultural Variations. Series: Improving Student Learning (18), Oxford: Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, pp. 176-188.

Brungardt, C. (2011), ‘The Intersection between Soft Skill Development and Leadership Education’, in Journal of Leadership Education, 10:1, 1-22.

Crawford K. (2012), ‘Rethinking the student/teacher nexus: students as consultants on teaching in higher education’ in Neary, M., Stevenson, H., Bell, L., Towards Teaching in Public: Reshaping the Modern University, London: Continuum books, pp. 52-67.

Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967), The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldin.

Healey, M. (2000), ‘Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education: A discipline-based approach’, in Higher Education Research & Development, 19:2, 169-189.

Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M. and Ryland, K. (2012), ‘Distributed leadership: a collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education’, in Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34:1, 67-78.

Jones, S. and Harvey, M. (2017), ‘A distributed leadership change process model for higher education’, in Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39:2, 126-139.

Keyser, M. W. (2000), ‘Active learning and cooperative learning: understanding the difference and using both styles effectively’, in Research Strategies, 17, 35-44.

Oblinger, D.G. (2004), ‘The Next Generation of Educational Engagement’, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004:1.

Prince, M. (2004), ‘Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research’, in Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231

Ronald S. L. and Chapman, A. (2009), ‘The technologisation of education: philosophical reflections on being too plugged in’, in International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 14:3, 289-298.

Tabata, L. N. and Johnsrud L. K. (2008), ‘The Impact of Faculty Attitudes Toward Technology, Distance Education and Innovation’, in Research in Higher Education, 49, 625–646.

Waite. S. (2011), ‘Teaching and learning outside the classroom: personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards’, in Education 3–13, 39:1, 65-82.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v13i2.1002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.