Using Mindomo to Engage Students in Higher-Order Thinking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v13i2.1080

Keywords:

Concept Map, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Online Collaboration, Pedagogical Design

Abstract

Mindomo (www.mindomo.com) is a web-based tool designed to aid in the creation of digital concept maps. This article provides an overview of concept mapping and Mindomo followed by reflections on implementing Mindomo in a digital technology course for pre-service teachers. A SWOT analysis of Mindomo is presented in concept map format, with the goals being to provide information helpful to anyone considering using Mindomo and to encourage instructors to consider how concept mapping might facilitate higher-order thinking in their classes.

Author Biography

Brandon M. Sabourin, University of Windsor

Brandon M. Sabourin is a sessional instructor in the Faculty of Education at the University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada. He teaches courses in digital technology and social media applications. An Ontario Certified Teacher (OCT), Brandon has completed graduate studies including a Masters of Education in Curriculum Studies and a post-graduate certificate in Open and Online Learning. Brandon’s current doctoral research is exploring educational development practices for sessional instructors 

References

Ausubel, D.P. (2000) The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7 (Accessed: 25 April 2020).

Brookfield, S. (1995) Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787901318.

Expert Software Applications (2019) History. Available at: https://www.exswap.com/about.html (Accessed: 12 August 2019).

Kinchin, I.M. (2015) ‘Editorial: Novakian concept mapping in university and professional education.’ Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 1-5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2015.07.001 (Accessed: 10 August 2019).

Mishra, P. and Koehler, M.J. (2006) ‘Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.’ Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x (Accessed: 10 August 2019).

Novak, J.D. (2010) ‘Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations.’ Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(3), 21-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/441 (Accessed: 10 August 2019).

Puentedura, R.R. (2013, May 29) ‘SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation.’ Web log post. Available at: http://hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html (Accessed: 12 August 2019).

Sabourin, B.M. (2019) ‘Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in the K-12 classroom.’ Available at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/research-result-summaries/80 (Accessed: 12 August 2019).

Schwendimann, B.A. (2015) ‘Concept maps as versatile tools to integrate complex ideas: From kindergarten to higher and professional education.’ Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 73-99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2015.07.006 (Accessed: 12 August 2019).

Turns, J., Atman, C.J. and Adams, R. (2000) ‘Concept maps for engineering education: A cognitively motivated tool supporting varied assessment functions.’ IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 164-173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/13.848069 (Accessed: 12 August, 2019).

Downloads

Published

07/30/2020