Identifying Factors that Influence the Uptake and Use of Moodle by Academics in three Arts Departments at Roehampton University


  • Karen Shackleford-Cesare University of Roehampton



e-learning, learning technologies, training, support


This paper explores factors influencing both the take up of Moodle at Roehampton University and the ways it was used by academics to support learning and teaching. It builds on the work of others who have sought to explore and explain why the introduction of various technologies in higher education have not transformed teaching practice in ways anticipated. This study also sought to inform policy and practice in the provision of support for academics in their use of learning technologies.

Author Biography

Karen Shackleford-Cesare, University of Roehampton

E-Learning AdvisorLearning Services


Anon, Statistical Tests in SPSS. UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. Available at: [Accessed July 18, 2011].

Blin, F. & Munro, M., 2008. Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, pp.475–490.

Brenton, S., 2009. E-Learning - an introduction. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall, eds. A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. London: Routledge, p. 525.

Browne, T., Jenkins, M. & Walker, R., 2006. A Longitudinal Perspective regarding the use of VLEs by Higher Education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2). Available at: [Accessed July 22, 2011].

Clegg, F., 1982. Simple statistics: a course book for the social sciences illustrated., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: [Accessed July 18, 2011].

Denscombe, M., 2007. The good research guide for small-scale social research projects 3rd ed., Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw Hill Open University Press. Available at: [Accessed June 25, 2011].

Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, 2010. Study of UK Online Learning, Higher Education Funding Council for England. Available at: [Accessed August 1, 2011].

Department for Education and Skills, 2003. The future of higher education, Department for Education and Skills. Available at: [Accessed August 3, 2010].

Ellis, C., 2011. Grademark: showing how we use GradeMark as part of assessment management. Available at: [Accessed August 3, 2011].

Ellis, R., Steed, A. & Applebee, A., 2006. Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), pp.312–335.

Glatthorn, A., 1998. Writing the winning dissertation: a step-by-step guide illustrated., California: Corwin Press. Available at: [Accessed June 21, 2011].

Hanson, J., 2003. Encouraging Lecturers to Engage with New Technologies in Learning and Teaching in a Vocational University: The Role of Recognition and Reward. Higher Education Management and Policy, 15(3), pp.153–170.

Heaton-Shrestha, C. et al., 2005. Introducing a VLE into campus-based undergraduate teaching: Staff perspectives on its impact on teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), pp.370–386.

HEFCE, 2001. Strategies for learning and teaching in higher education: a guide to good practice, UK: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Available at: [Accessed July 29, 2011].

HEFCE, Joint Information Systems Committee & Higher Education Academy, 2005. HEFCE strategy for e-learning, Higher Education Funding Council for England. Available at: [Accessed August 3, 2010].

Jenkins, M., Browne, T. & Armitage, S., 2001. Management and implementation of Virtual Learning Environments: a UCISA funded survey, UCISA. Available at: [Accessed July 22, 2011].

Laurilliard, D., 2010. E-Learning in higher education. In Changing Higher Education. RoutledgeFalmer. Available at: [Accessed April 7, 2010].

Mingers, J., 2001. Combining IS Research Methods: towards a Pluralist Methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(3), pp.240–259.

National Union of Students, 2010. Student perspectives on technology – demand, perceptions and training needs, Higher Education Funding Council for England. Available at: [Accessed August 1, 2011].

Oliver, M. & Trigwell, K., 2005. Can “Blended Learning” be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), pp.17–26.

Schneckenberg, D., Ehlers, U. & Adelsberger, H., 2010. Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning—Potentials and implications for higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology - Wiley InterScience, pp.1–16.

Skelly, B., 2009. Age is no barrier to technology use. The Post.IE - The Sunday Business Post Online. Available at: [Accessed August 21, 2011].

Smith, J., 2005. From flowers to palms: 40 years of policy for online learning. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 13(2), pp.93–108.

Turcan, M., 2010. Expectancy theory as a predictor of faculty motivation to use a course management system. Doctor of Education. USA: Clemson University. Available at: [Accessed July 18, 2011].

Weller, M., 2006. VLE 2.0 and future directions in learning environments. In A. Voerman & J. Dalziel, eds. Proceedings of the First International LAMSConference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning. LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning. Sydney, Australia: LAMS Foundation, pp. 99–106. Available at: [Accessed August 17, 2011].

Willingham, D., 2002. Ask the Cognitive Scientist - Inflexible Knowledge: The First Step to Expertise. American Federation of Teachers (AFT) - American Educator. Available at: [Accessed August 30, 2010].

Zellweger Moser, F., 2007. Faculty adoption of educational technology: educational technology support plays a critical role in helping faculty add technology to their teaching. Educause Quarterly, (1), pp.66–69.

Zemsky, R. & Massy, F., 2004. Thwarted innovation what happened to e-learning and why, Pennsylvania, USA: The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania. Available at: [Accessed July 29, 2011].