Generative Artificial Intelligence and the doctoral student: procedural and ethical considerations.

Authors

  • Mark Betteney
  • Bing Yin
  • John Kpukumu
  • Michelle Cox
  • Meena Malhi
  • Della Mulhare
  • Mutiat Olaifa
  • Xiaonan Duan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v18i1.1618

Abstract

This opinion piece reports the discussions of a group of seven EdD (Doctor of Education) students and their tutor (lead author), who together have co-authored this paper. The piece identifies our diverse attitudes, anxieties, aspirations or apprehensions regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). The discussion evolved to explore six main areas: academic literacy; ethical use of GenAI; the need for originality; the consistency of attitudes held by assessors and supervisors; the specificity of university guidance; and the viva as an assessment tool. The extent to which aspects of the discussion resonated with examples of published work was also considered.

Downloads

Published

09/24/2025

How to Cite

Betteney, M., Yin, B., Kpukumu, J., Cox, M., Malhi, M., Mulhare, D., … Duan, X. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the doctoral student: procedural and ethical considerations. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v18i1.1618

Issue

Section

Opinion Pieces