A practical case study exploring how flipped learning affects the development of problem solving skills in two different disciplines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v10i1.426Keywords:
Active Learning, Flipped Classroom, Problem Solving Skills, Student Centred Learning, Facilitator,Abstract
This study explores how a flipped learning pedagogy was introduced to two separate student groups, within different disciplines, law and computing and compares the findings that have begun to emerge in relation to the development of a range of skills in particular the development of problem solving skills. Analytical and problem solving skills are not only the key skills for both law students and computing students, but are key skills for any graduate. The findings suggest the flipped classroom approach can increase student participation, engagement, supports the development of critical thinking and problem solving skills and promotes deeper levels of learning. The findings also support that this method of teaching and learning encourages the development of independent study skills and provides opportunities for students to develop and practice the core skills required of their discipline. This paper will also explore the perceived challenges and benefits experienced by both students and academics working with a flipped teaching and learning strategy during the academic year 2014/15.References
Asef-Vaziri, A. (2015) ‘The Flipped Classroom of Operations: A Not-For-Cost-Reduction Platform.’ Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(1), 71-89.
Beichner, R (2006) ‘North Carolina State University: SCALE-UP.’ In: Oblinger, D. (ed.), Learning Spaces. Boulder, CO: Educause.
Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012) ‘How the Flipped Classroom is Radically Transforming Learning.’ The Daily Riff. Available at: http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/how-the-flipped-classroom-is-radically-transforming-learning-536.php (Accessed: 04 April 2017).
Bernett, R., Parry, G and Coate, K. (2001) ‘Conceptualising Curriculum Change.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 435-449.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L. and Ball, N. (2013) ‘Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course.’ Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.
Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014) The four pillars of F-L-I-P. Available at: http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
(Accessed: 12 March 2016).
Fulton, K. (2012) ‘Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning.’ Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.
Halili, S. H. and Zainuddin, Z. (2015) ‘Flipping the classroom: What we know and what we don't.’ The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(1), 28–35.
Halili, S. H., Abdul Razak, R. and Zainuddin, Z. (2014) ‘Enhancing collaborative learning in flipped classroom.’ Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 147–149.
Hamdam, N., McKnight, P., McKnight K. and Arfstrom K.M. (2013) The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled - A Review of Flipped Learning. Available at http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2015).
Hannafin, M., Hill, J. and Land, S. (1997) ‘Student-centred learning and interactive multimedia: status, issues and implication.’ Contemp Educ, 68(2), 94-99.
Hibbard, L., Sung, S. and Wells, B. (2016) ‘Examining the Effectiveness of a Semi-Self-Paced Flipped Learning Format in a College General Chemistry Sequence.’ Journal of Chemistry Education, 93, 24−30.
James, A. J., Chin, C. K. H. and Williams, B. R. (2014) ‘Using the flipped classroom to improve student engagement and to prepare graduates to meet maritime industry requirements: a focus on maritime education.’ WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(2), 331-343.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O. and Getman, J. (2014) ‘The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50.
King, A. (1993) ‘From sage on the stage to guide on the side.’ Coll Teach, 41(1), 30-35.
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002) ‘Revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview.’ Theory Pract, 41(4), 212-218.
Kong, S. C. (2014) ‘Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy.’ Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.
Little, C. (2015) ‘The flipped classroom in further education: literature review and case study.’ Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(3).
Mayer, R. (2002) The promise of educational psychology: Learning in the content areas. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
Mazur, E. (1991) ‘Can We Teach Computers to Teach?’ Computers in Physics, 5 (1), 31-38.
Mazur, E. (2009) ‘Farewell, Lecture?’ Science, 323, 50-51.
NMC (2014) Horizon Report 2014: Higher Education Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Nederveld, A. and Berge, Z. L. (2015) ‘Flipped learning in the workplace.’ Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(2), 162-172.
O'Flaherty, J. and Phillips, G. (2015) ‘The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review.’ Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Pallis A.A. and Ng, A. (2011) ‘Pursuing maritime education: an empirical study of students’ profiles, motivations and expectations.’ Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 38(4), 369-393.
Pogrow, S. (1990) The HOTS approach to using computers with at-risk students. Tucson, AZ: Thinking with computers.
Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., Weller, M. and Whitelock, D. (2014) Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Open University Innovation Report 3. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
Strayer, J. (2012) ‘How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation.’ Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a more equitable global exchange of knowledge.
Â
Works are released under the default licence of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) licence, which provides unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If authors require a divergent licence, please contact [happy to have 'the Scholarly Communications Manager' (ks8035h@gre.ac.uk) listed here if that is easier.]
Â
Authors of articles published in Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching remain the copyright holders to their published work and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to terms of the Creative Commons license agreement applied to the work by Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching.
Â
Self-archiving policy: authors are permitted, and encouraged, to deposit any version of their article - submitted, accepted, and published versions - in subject and institutional repositories at any time.Â
Â
If you have any queries about the choice of license, or which to discuss other options, please contact the Scholarly Communications Manager at scholarlycommunications@greenwich.ac.uk.
