One size doesn’t fit all: rethinking approaches to continuing professional development in technology enhanced learning

Martin Compton, Timos Almpanis

Abstract


Despite extensive investment, levels of enthusiasm for technology enhanced learning (TEL) are notoriously varied amongst the key stakeholders. A growing body of research shows that TEL is often expected by students and, when used effectively, has a positive impact on engagement and outcomes. Despite this, transmissive models of continuous professional development (CPD) that focus on the technology and systems over the pedagogic underpinnings can feel like a compliance mechanism ripe for resistance. We argue that a more effective approach utilises simpler, cloud based tools to highlight pedagogic approaches and that adaptations in the way CPD happens provide an environment within which exploration, utilisation and even transformation in practice can occur. 


Keywords


TEL, Technology enhanced learning, CPD, VLE, cloud, elearning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackerman, A. S. & Krupp, M. L. (2012). Five Components to Consider for BYOT/BYOD. International Association for Development of the Information Society. [Online]. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542652.pdf [Last accessed 26 March 2017]

Almpanis, T. (2015a) Staff development and wider institutional approaches around technology enhanced learning in higher education institutions in the United Kingdom from the heads of e-learning perspective. PhD thesis. [Online]. Available at: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/83741/

Almpanis, T. (2015b) Staff Development and Institutional Support for Technology Enhanced Learning in UK universities, Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13 (5), 379-388 [Online] Available at: http://www.ejel.org/volume13/issue5/p379

Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0: ideas, technologies and implications for education. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf [Last accessed 22 March 2017] JISC Technology & Standards Watch.

Attwell, G. and Hughes, J. (2010). Pedagogic Approaches to Using Technology for Learning. [Online]. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110414152025/http:/www.lluk.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Pedagogical-appraches-for-using-technology-literature-review-january-11-FINAL.pdf [Last accessed 25 March 2017]

Bates, A. T. (2000). Managing technological change. Jossey-Bass.

Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (2007). (Eds.) Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. Designing and delivering e-learning. London: Routledge.

Bitner, N. & Bitner, J. (2002). Integrating technology into the classroom: Eight keys to success. Journal of technology and teacher education, 10 (1), 95-100.

Bradshaw, P., Twining, P. & Walsh, C. S. (2012). The Vital Program: Transforming ICT Professional Development, American Journal of Distance Education, 26 (2), 74-85

Butler, D. and Sellbom, M. (2002). ‘Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning’. Educause Quarterly 2, 22-28.

Cook, J. and Jenkins, V. (2010). Getting Started with e-Assessment. Bath: University of Bath.

Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Isham, C., Evans, D., Firth, A. (2007). What do specialists do in CPD programmes for which there is evidence of positive outcomes for pupils and teachers? Report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London (summary available: http://www.eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2275)

Daly, C. Pachler, N. & Pelletier, C. (2009). Continuing Professional Development in ICT for teachers: A literature review WLE Centre, Institute of Education, University of London

DeSantis, N. (2012) Self described Edupunk says colleges should abandon course management systems. The Chronicle of Higher Education.[Online] Available at: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Self-Described-EduPunk-Says/130917

Donnelly, R., & O'Rourke, K. C. (2007). What now? Evaluating eLearning CPD practice in Irish third‐level education. Journal of Further and Higher Education,31(1), 31-40.

Ecclesfield, N., Rebbeck, G., & Garnett, F. (2013). The Case Of The Curious And The Confident-The Untold Story Of Changing Teacher Attitudes To E-Learning And “Technology In Action” In The FE Sector. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 3(5).

Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8:3, 381-391

Hew, K. F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research.Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of curriculum studies, 37(2), 155-192.

Hughes, J. and Kidd, W. (n.d.). Working with Diverse Groups of Learners in the Digital Age. [Online]. Escalate Available at: http://escalate.ac.uk/downloads/8642.pdf [Last accessed 21 May 2017]

Kennedy, A. (2011). Collaborative continuing professional development

(CPD) for teachers in Scotland: aspirations, opportunities and barriers, European Journal of Teacher Education, 34:1, 25-41

Koehler, M. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70

Newman, T and Beetham, H. (2017). Student Digital Experience Tracker 2017: the voices of 22,000 UK learners. Bristol: Jisc.

Oblinger, D. (2012). Game changers education and information technologies. Educause.

Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.

Romiszowski, A. J. (2004). How's the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology-, 44(1), 5-27.

Rowan, C. (2014). Five Arguments for the Restriction of Education Technology in Elementary School Settings. [Online]. Available at: http://www.zonein.ca/zoneinworkshop/articles/five-arguments-for-the-elimination-of-education-technology-in-elementary-school-settings/ [Last accessed 22 May 2017]

Walker, R., Voce, J., Nicholls, J., Swift, E., Ahmed, J., Horrigan, S. & Vincent, P. (2016). Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association (UCISA)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i1.708

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.