The Padlet Project: Transforming student engagement in Foundation Year seminars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i2.714Keywords:
Active Learning, Padlet, Seminars, EngagementAbstract
How do we get students to engage more actively with the material they are learning? This was the primary question for us when teaching a cohort of Foundation Year Psychology undergraduates at University of Sussex. Traditional seminars were often dominated by one or two more confident students whilst many of the quieter students failed to contribute. Even when prompted, they were reluctant to speak up. Other students, perhaps who had not completed the preparation for the seminar, also remained quiet but for a different reason. Having failed to complete the preparatory tasks, they could not make meaningful contributions. The role of the tutor became increasingly a case of “sage on the stage” with students looking to the tutor for guidance and dissemination of knowledge about the key readings they should have been working on. The Padlet Project was designed as a response to this, moving the focus from passive presence to active collaboration. All students, by the very nature of the project, were actively involved in each seminar and the quality of the products produced exceeded all expectations.References
Baildon, M., Lin, M., & Chia, G. (2016) ‘Developing conceptual understanding in social studies using technology and discussion.’ HSSE Online, 5(2), 94-102. Available at: https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/18683/1/HSSE-5-2-94.pdf (Accessed: 18th Oct 2018).
Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A. and Felten, P. (2011) ‘Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers.’ International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690 (Accessed: 18th Oct 2018).
Chaijaroen, S. and Khanjak, I. (2008).Synthesis of learning innovation model enhancing learning’s potential using brain-based learning. Khon Kaen: Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University.
Cotterill, S.T. (2015) ‘Tearing up the page: re-thinking the development of effective learning environments in higher education.’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(4), 403-413. Available at: https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703297.2013.862174#.W8hPLntKiUk (Accessed: 18th Oct 2018).
Kuh, G.D. (1993) ‘In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom.’ American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 277-304. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/00028312030002277 (Accessed: 18th Oct 2018).
Davies, M. (2014) ‘Using the Apple iPad to facilitate student-led group work and seminar presentation.’ Nurse education in practice, 14(4), 363-367. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595314000079 (Accessed: 18th Oct 2018).
Fink, L.D. (2003) A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning. University of Oklahoma, 27, p11. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2011/06/selfdirected1.pdf (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Jankowska, M. and Atlay, M. (2008) ‘Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement.’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 271-279. Available at: https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703290802176162#.W8hQTXtKiUk (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Jonassen, D.H. (2008) Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson. ISBN: 978-0132565585.
Kuh, G.D. (1995) ‘The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development.’ The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123-155. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.1995.11774770?journalCode=uhej20 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Kuh, G.D. and Hu, S. (2001) ‘Learning productivity at research universities.’ The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 1-28. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.2001.11778862?journalCode=uhej20 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Kuh, G.D. and Vesper, N. (1997) ‘A comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994.’The Review of Higher Education, 21(1), 43-61. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30036 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001) ‘Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?’ Environment and behavior, 33(3), 343-367. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013916501333002 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Mann, S.J. (2001) ‘Alternative perspectives on the student experience: alienation and engagement.’ Studies in higher education, 26(1), 7-19. Available at: https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070020030689#.W8hTHntKiUk (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Risjord, M. (2010) ‘The rise of qualitative research.’ Nursing Knowledge: Science, Practice, and Philosophy, 188-194. Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-17756-006 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Salaber, J. (2014) ‘Facilitating student engagement and collaboration in a large postgraduate course using wiki-based activities.’ The International Journal of Management Education, 12(2), 115-126. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811714000135 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Coulson, R.L., Jacobson, M., Durgunoglu, A., Ravlin, S. and Jehng, J.C. (1992) Knowledge Acquisition for Application: Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer of Training in III-Structured Domains.
Urbana, IL: Illinois University at Urbana Center for the Study of Reading.
Tross, S.A., Harper, J.P., Osher, L.W. and Kneidinger, L.M. (2000) ‘Not just the usual cast of characteristics: Using personality to predict college performance and retention.’ Journal of College Student Development, 41(3), 323. Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-03721-005 (Accessed: 18th October 2018).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a more equitable global exchange of knowledge.
Â
Works are released under the default licence of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) licence, which provides unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If authors require a divergent licence, please contact [happy to have 'the Scholarly Communications Manager' (ks8035h@gre.ac.uk) listed here if that is easier.]
Â
Authors of articles published in Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching remain the copyright holders to their published work and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to terms of the Creative Commons license agreement applied to the work by Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching.
Â
Self-archiving policy: authors are permitted, and encouraged, to deposit any version of their article - submitted, accepted, and published versions - in subject and institutional repositories at any time.Â
Â
If you have any queries about the choice of license, or which to discuss other options, please contact the Scholarly Communications Manager at scholarlycommunications@greenwich.ac.uk.