Exploring first-year undergraduates’ perceptions of poetry and their acquisition of skills in reading poetry for study at university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i2.791Keywords:
Poetry, Vocabulary, Communities of Learning, Case studiesAbstract
There is significant evidence drawn from student evaluations that students embarking on undergraduate English degrees feel uneasy about studying poetry and that this anxiety has an effect on the course choices they make as they progress through the three years of their programme. This study aims to investigate the causes of students’ responses to poetry and to make a beginning in looking at the implications that this has for teaching and learning. It explores students’ acquisition of skills and attitudes that make poetry-reading a rewarding activity. Data has been gathered from focus groups with first-year undergraduate students in an English department at a UK university to discover what perceptions of poetry are held by students and what factors in teaching contribute to the development and/or perpetuation of these perceptions. In brief, the study finds that for effective teaching the cultivation of enthusiasm for poetry is just as important as building technical vocabulary and learning techniques of formal analysis. There is some evidence that the latter flows out of the former. It also finds that students feel the former is often overlooked in the classroom.References
Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morrison K. (2011) Research Methods in Education, 7th edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cox, B. (1991) Cox on Cox: An English curriculum for the 1990s. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Dias, P. & Hayhoe, M. (1988) Developing Response to Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, J. (2009) English renewed: visions of English among teachers of 1966. English in Education, 43(3), 241-50.
Fowler, F.J. Jr. (2009) Survey Research Methods, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fuller, J. (2011) Who is Ozymandias? And Other Puzzles in Poetry. London: Vintage.
Glesne, C. (2011) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 4th edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London: Routledge.
Iser, W. (1988) The reading process; a phenomenological approach. In Lodge, D. and Wood, N. (eds) Modern Criticism and Theory. Edinburgh: Pearson, 1988. 295-310.
Knapp, J. (2002) Teaching Poetry via HEI (Hypothesis-Experiment-Instruction). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 45(8), 718-729.
Leavis, F.R. (1952) The Common Pursuit. London: Chatto & Windus.
Lennard, J. (2005) The Poetry Handbook: A Guide to Reading Poetry for Pleasure and Practical Criticism, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, D.L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Naylor, A. & Wood, A.B. (2012) Teaching Poetry: Reading and responding to poetry in the secondary classroom. Abingdon: Routledge.
Norton, Lin S. (2008). Action Research in Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.
Padel, R. (2004) 52 Ways of Looking at a Poem: A Poem for Every Week of the Year. London: Vintage.
Paulin, T. (2008) The Secret Life of Poems: A Poetry Primer. London: Faber.
Rosenblatt, L. (1970) Literature as Exploration. London: Heinemann.
Rosenblatt, L. (1978) The Reader, the Text and the Poem. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Smithson, J. (2000) Using and analyzing focus groups: limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3 (2), 103-19.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, R. (2009) The Poetry Toolkit: The Essential Guide to Studying Poetry. London: Continuum.
Woloksky, S. (2001) The Art of Poetry: How to Read a Poem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a more equitable global exchange of knowledge.
Â
Works are released under the default licence of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) licence, which provides unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If authors require a divergent licence, please contact [happy to have 'the Scholarly Communications Manager' (ks8035h@gre.ac.uk) listed here if that is easier.]
Â
Authors of articles published in Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching remain the copyright holders to their published work and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to terms of the Creative Commons license agreement applied to the work by Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching.
Â
Self-archiving policy: authors are permitted, and encouraged, to deposit any version of their article - submitted, accepted, and published versions - in subject and institutional repositories at any time.Â
Â
If you have any queries about the choice of license, or which to discuss other options, please contact the Scholarly Communications Manager at scholarlycommunications@greenwich.ac.uk.