Increasing the interaction time in a lecture by integrating flipped classroom and just-in-time teaching concepts

Authors

  • Kamran Arshad University of Greenwich
  • Muhammad Ali Imran University of Surrey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v4i7.84

Abstract

Limited contact time in the traditional lecture structure poses a challenge for the lecturer to select the depth of material covered in the lecture while ensuring complete coverage of the syllabus. In the case of large groups, this also restricts the time that can be dedicated for enquiry based learning and active engagement with the students. This lack of enquiry based learning is cited as one of the main disadvantages of traditional lectures as a teaching strategy (Cashin 1985). Furthermore, due to the diverse learning abilities of the students some concepts are very basic for a subset of the class and they lose their focus if they feel that trivial points are being discussed in a session.

Author Biographies

Kamran Arshad, University of Greenwich

Dr Kamran Arshad is a senior lecturer in Engineering at University of Greenwich. Dr Arshad has more than 80 technical peer-reviewed publications in peer-reviewed journals/conferences and he won 3 best paper awards. He is author of a book titled Radio Wave Propagation Modelling Using Finite Element Method published by Lambert Academic Publishing (Germany) in 2010.

Muhammad Ali Imran, University of Surrey

Dr Muhammad Ali Imran received his M.Sc. (Distinction) and Ph.D. degrees from Imperial College London, UK, in 2002 and 2007, respectively. He is currently a lecturer at the University of Surrey, UK. He is involved in undergraduate and postgraduate teaching and supervision of research students. He is a fellow of Higher Education Academy.

References

Cousin, G. (2008). Researching Learning in Higher Education, New York: Routledge.

Hake, R.R. (1998). 'Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses', American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. (2009), Developing undergraduate research and inquiry, York: Higher Education Academy.

Kirschner, P.A.; Sweller, J. and Clark, R.E. (2006). 'Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist,Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching', Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

Laws, P. (1991). 'Calculus-based Physics withour Lectures', Physics Today, 44(12), 24-31.

Mazur, E. (1996). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

McDermott, L. (1991) 'Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned - Closing the gap', American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301-315.

Novak, G.M.; Patterson, E.T.; Garvin, A.D. and Christian, W. (1999) Just-in-time Teaching, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.

Simkins, S. and Maier, M.H. (eds.) (2010) Just-in-time Teaching - Across the discipline, across the academy, Sterling VA, USA: Stylus Publishing LLC.

Sutherland, T.E. and Bonwell, C.C. (eds.) (1996). Using active learning in college classes: a range of options for faculty, San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012), Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, USA: ISTE and ASCD.

Downloads

Published

06/30/2013