From Local to Institutional Attainment Change: scaling-up local initiatives

Phil Gravestock, Debra Cureton

Abstract


Ethnicity-based gaps in degree outcomes are a pervasive sector issue. At the University of Wolverhampton, substantial investments have been made a) to fund research into why the outcomes gap occurs, the better to understand it, and then b) to implement and evaluate initiatives to reduce it. However, upscaling smaller initiatives to university-wide actions can be fraught with issues. This case study will provide a synthesis of the research carried out at Wolverhampton and the ways this was used as an evidence-base to inform institutional change. The study will also consider some of the lessons learnt from our attempts to embed the outcomes into institutional business as usual.


Keywords


Attainment; disparities; institutional change

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloxham, S. and Boyd, P. (2007) Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: a practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335221073

Cousin, G. and Cureton, D. (2012) Disparities in Student Attainment (DiSA). York: Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/projects/

worlverhampton_2010_disa_final_report.pdf (Accessed: 28 August 2018).

Crosling, G., Heagney, M. and Thomas, L. (2009) ‘Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: improving teaching and learning.’ Australian Universities’ Review, 51(2), 9-18. Available at: http://www.universityworldnews.com/filemgmt_data/files/AUR_51-02_Crosling.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Cureton, D. and Gravestock, P. (2018) ‘Supporting students’ learning: the power of the student-teacher relationship.’ In: M. Shah and J. McKay (eds.) Achieving Equity and Quality in Higher Education: global perspectives in an era of widening participation. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 51-71. ISBN: 9783319783154

Cureton, D., Groves, M., Day, P. and Williams, C. (2017) Supporting student success: strategies for institutional change; University of Wolverhampton. Institutional Report for the ‘What Works? Student Retention & Success’ initiative. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.phf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/University-of-Wolverhampton-final.pdf (Accessed: 28 August 2018).

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J. and Jones, R. (2017) ‘Independent Learning: what we do when you’re not there.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145-161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031 (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Houghton, A-M. and Anderson, J. (2017) Embedding Mental Wellbeing in the Curriculum: maximising success in higher education. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/hub/download/embedding_wellbeing_in_he.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Howell-Richardson, C. (2012) ‘Challenges in Academic Writing Project.’ Unpublished research data. Coventry University: Centre for Academic Writing.

Humphrey, O. and Lowe, T. (2017) ‘Exploring how a sense of belonging is facilitated at different stages of the student journey in higher education.’ Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(1), 172-188. Available at: https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/583 (Accessed: 10 May 2019).

Hutton, D. (1994) The Change Agents’ Handbook: a survival guide for quality improvement champions. Wisconsin: American Society for Quality. ISBN: 0873892879

Krause, K-L. (2001) ‘The University Essay Writing Experience: a pathway for academic integration during transition.’ Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 147-168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123586 (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Masika, R. and Jones, J. (2016) ‘Building student belonging and engagement: insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138-150. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=112735256&site=ehost-live (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Mountford-Zimdars, A., Sabri, D., Moore, J., Sanders, J., Jones, S. and Higham, L. (2015) Causes of differences in student outcomes. (Report to HEFCE by King’s College London, ARC Network and The University of Manchester.) Bristol: HEFCE. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/23653/1/HEFCE2015_diffout.pdf (Accessed: 7 May 2019).

Nicol, D. (2009) ‘Transforming Assessment and Feedback: enhancing integration and empowerment in the first year.’ Quality Enhancement Themes: The First Year Experience. Glasgow: QAA Scotland. Available at: https://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/REAP/transforming-assessment-and-feedback.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Oldham, S. and Dhillon, J. (2012) ‘Student voices: perceptions of learning, assignments and achievement.’ DISA Briefing Paper 12, Disparities in Student Attainment project. Available at: https://www.wlv.ac.uk/staff/the-college-of-learning-and-teaching-colt/learning-and-teaching-research/wolverhampton-learning-and-teaching-projects/disparities-in-student-attainment-disa/project-dissemination/ (Accessed: 10 May 2019).

Thomas, L. (2012) Building Student Engagement and Belonging at a Time of Change in Higher Education: final report from the What Works? Student Retention & Success programme. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.phf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/What-Works-report-final.pdf (Accessed: 28 August 2018).

Thomas, L., Hill, M., O’Mahony, J. and Yorke, M. (2017) Supporting Student Success: strategies for institutional change: What Works? Student Retention and Success programme Final Report. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.phf.org.uk/publications/works-student-retention-success-full/ (Accessed: 31 August 2018).

Tinto, V. (2006) ‘Research and Practice of Student Retention: what next?’ Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1-19. Available at: https://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/Tinto_2006_what_next23657.pdf (Accessed: 1 May 2019).

Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M. and Rowntree, J. (2017) ‘Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: a systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes.’ Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 (Accessed: 1 May 2019).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v12i1.941

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.