Curriculum co-creation as a transformative strategy to address differential student outcomes: the example of Kingston University’s Student Curriculum Consultant Programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v12i1.955Keywords:
inclusive curriculum, differential attainment, co-creationAbstract
This paper examines the role that curriculum co-creation can play in creating a more inclusive higher education and in so doing, address the complex challenge of differential student outcomes and attainment. It achieves this by exploring Kingston University’s Curriculum Consultant programme within this context of their Inclusive Curriculum Framework. Students who work as Curriculum Consultants use their own diverse lived experiences and Kingston University’s Inclusive Curriculum Framework (ICF) to collaborate with staff to create more accessible, diverse and globally relevant curricula at all levels of the institution. The consultants work with staff in a variety of ways, providing feedback on the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) experience of individual modules, the inclusivity of teaching resources, and areas where the curriculum represents potential barriers to some groups of students. They also take leadership roles, participating in and facilitating staff development workshops focused on inclusive teaching and learning. This paper examines three instances of co-creation facilitated through the Curriculum Consultant programme. We argue that the Curriculum Consultant programme acts as a mechanism through which the institution can not only legitimate, but also actively endorse and encourage co-creation in order to create more inclusive curricula.References
Barnett, R. and Coate, K. (2005) Engaging the curriculum in higher education: Berkshire: SRHE and OU Press.
Brink, C. (2009). “Standards will drop” and other fears about the equality agenda in higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(1):11‑30. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v21-art2-en
Daddow, A., Moraitis, P. and Carr, A. (2013) Non-traditional students in tertiary education: inter-disciplinary collaboration in curriculum and pedagogy in community services education in Australia, International Journal of Inclusive Education, Vol. 17, No. 5, 480– 489, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.685765
Crozier, G., Reay, D. & Clayton, J. (2008) Different strokes for different folks: diverse students in diverse institutions, Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 167–177.
Fraser, S. and Bosanquet, A. (2006) The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31 (3) 269-84.
Haigh, M. (2009) Fostering Cross-Cultural Empathy with Non-Western Curricular Structures, Journal of Studies, International Education, 13, 2 271-284 DOI: 10.1177/1028315308329791
Hefce (Higher Education Funding Council) (2015). Differences in degree outcomes: The effect of subject and student characteristics. Issue paper 2015/21. Bristol. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE2014/Content/Pubs/2015/201521/HEFCE2015_21.pdf
Healey, M. Flint A. and Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education: York: HEA.
Hockings, C. (2010) Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education: a synthesis of research. York: The Higher Education Academy. Available from: www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/inclusion/wp/inclusive_teaching_and_learning_in_he.doc
Hughes, A. (2016) Exploring normative whiteness: ensuring inclusive pedagogic practice in undergraduate fieldwork teaching and learning, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 22 March 2016, p.1-18 DOI: 10.1080/03098265.2016.1155206
Levy, P., Little, S. & Whelen, N. (2010). Perspectives on staff–student partnerships in learning, research and educational enhancement. In Little, S. (ed.) Staff–student partnerships in higher education 1–15. London: Continuum.
Maila, M. (2010) Curriculum as open-ended inquiry in higher education, Africa Education Review, 7, 2 263-282 DOI: 10.1080/18146627.2010.515385
McCulloch, A. (2009) The student as co-producer. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 2, 171-183.
McDuff, N., Tatam, J.C., Beacock, O. & Ross, F.M. (2018). Closing the attainment gap for students from black and minority ethnic backgrounds through institutional change. Journal of Widening Participation and Life Long Learning 20(1):79 101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.20.1.79
McDuff, A. and Hughes, A. (2015) Kingston’s Inclusive Curriculum Framework, Available at: http://www.kingston.ac.uk/aboutkingstonuniversity/equality-diversity-and-inclusion/our-inclusive-curriculum/inclusive-curriculum-framework/
McKay, J. & Devlin, M. (2014) ‘Uni has a different language … to the real world’: demystifying academic culture and discourse for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, Higher Education Research & Development, 33:5, 949-961, DOI:10.1080/07294360.2014.890570
Meuleman, A., Garrett, R., Wrench, A. and King, S., (2015) ‘Some people might say I’m thriving but…’: non-traditional students experiences of university, International Journal of Inclusive Education International Journal of Inclusive Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.945973
Mountford-Zimdars, A., Sabri, D., Moore, J., Sanders, J., Jones, S. and Higham, L. (2015) Causes of differences in student outcomes, Report to HEFCE by King’s College London, ARC Network and The University of Manchester http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Causes,of,differences,in,student,outcomes/HEFCE2015_diffout.pdf
Millward, C. (2018) Keynote, Addressing barriers to Student Success Programme, Annual Conference, 24th May 2018.
Neary, M. (2012). Student as producer: How do revolutionary teachers teach? Winchester: Zero Books.
Office for Students (2018) Differences in student outcomes, Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/differences-in-student-outcomes/
Reay, D. Crozier, G. and Clayton, J. (2010) Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education, British Educational Research Journal, Vol.36(1), pp.107-124
Richardson, J. (2015) The under-attainment of ethnic minority students in UK higher Education: what we know and what we don’t know, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39, 2: 278:291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.858680
Ross, F., Tatam, J. Hughes, A., Beacock, O. and McDuff, N. (2018) “The great unspoken shame of UK Higher Education”: Addressing inequalities of attainment, African Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 12 No. 1, June 2018, 104‑115
Steele, D, Ryan, PA. (2014) Students perceptions of internationalisation in higher education. SRHE Annual Research Conference-Inspiring future generations; embracing plurality and difference in higher education. South Wales, UK
Svensson, L. and Wihlborg, M. (2010) Internationalising the content of higher education: the need for a curriculum perspective. Higher Education, 60: 595-613 DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9318-6
Tange, H. and Kastberg, P. (2013) Coming to terms with ‘double knowing’: an inclusive approach to international education, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 1 1-14 DOI:10.1080/13603116.2011.580460.
Umbach, P. (2006) The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, Vol.47(3), pp.317-345.
Universities UK (2016) Working In Partnership: Enabling Social Mobility In Higher Education, the final report of the Social Mobility Advisory Group. Available at:
http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2016/working-in-partnership-final.pdf
Willis, P. and Gregory, A. (2016) Making the road while walking: co-creation, teaching excellence and university leadership, Stimulus paper, Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a more equitable global exchange of knowledge.
Â
Works are released under the default licence of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) licence, which provides unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If authors require a divergent licence, please contact [happy to have 'the Scholarly Communications Manager' (ks8035h@gre.ac.uk) listed here if that is easier.]
Â
Authors of articles published in Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching remain the copyright holders to their published work and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to terms of the Creative Commons license agreement applied to the work by Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching.
Â
Self-archiving policy: authors are permitted, and encouraged, to deposit any version of their article - submitted, accepted, and published versions - in subject and institutional repositories at any time.Â
Â
If you have any queries about the choice of license, or which to discuss other options, please contact the Scholarly Communications Manager at scholarlycommunications@greenwich.ac.uk.