‘Flipping the classroom’: a theoretical and practical exploration

Lynne Jump


This case study explores the use of the ‘flipped classroom’ in the context of an undergraduate Academic Preparation course. The initiative inverted delivery of the course in that the students studied the formal content as homework and small group discussion and individual support was provided during face to face classroom time. There is very little research evidence in support of the recommendations that by flipping the classroom overall student learning is improved. Therefore this study explores the concepts that underpin the flipped classroom both theoretically and practically, and reports on student feedback of the initiative. As a group the students expressed low levels of satisfaction with the course delivery but individually students reported a strong sense of personal achievement.

Full Text:



Ayers , D. F. (2011). A Critical Realist Orientation to Learner Needs. Adult Education Quarterly, 341 - 357.

Bamber, V. (2011). Institutional evaluative practice: quality enhancement and regulation. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber, Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education: The Practice Turn (pp. 127 - 132). Maidenhead: Open University press.

Barnett, R. (2011). Being a University (Foundations and Futures of Education). Oxford: Routledge.

Baron, J., Willis, J., & Lee, R.-A. (2010). Creating Higher Education Academic and Information Technology Resources in an International Context. Computers in the Schools, 288 - 308.

Barthes, R. (1967). Death of the Author. Translated into English in: Image Music Text in 1977.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012, May). Flipping the Classroom. www.TECHLEARNING.COM, pp. 42-43.

Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, J. (2012, April 14). The Flipped Classroom: Myths vs Reality. The Daily Riff: Be Smarter About Education.

Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory Reseach and Critique. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Berrett, D. (2012, February 24). How 'Flipping' the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture. The Chronical of Higher Education, pp. 16-18.

Burrus, C., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2008). Global Warming Toward Open Educational Resources. Communications of the ACM, 30-32.

Callon, M. (2012). Society in the Making:The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch, The Social Construction of Technological Systems (pp. 77 - 98). Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Evans, M. A. (2011). A critical-realist response to the postmodern agenda in instructional design and technology: a way forward. Education Tech Research Dev, 799- 815.

Jump, L. (2011). Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: a systematic review. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp55-68.

Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1985). The Social Construction of Technology. In D. MacKenzie, & J. Wajcman, The Social Shaping of Technology (pp. 113 - 115). Maidenhead: open University Press.

Krause, K.-L. (2011). Whole-of-University strategies for evaluating the student experience. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber, Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education: The Practice Turn (pp. 139 - 144). Maidenhead: Open University press.

Lane, P., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or sytemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp 952-962.

Letourneau, N., & Allen, M. (1999). Post-positivist critical multiplism: a beginning dialogue. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp 623-630.

Saunders, M. (2011). Insights into programmatic evaluative practice in HE: a commentary. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber, Reconceptualising Evaluation in Higher Education: The Practice Turn (pp. 113 - 124). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Wiley, D., & Gurrell, S. (2009). Context and Catalyst: a decade of development... Open Learning, 11-21.

Young, M. F. (2008). Bringing Knowledge Back In: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Oxford: Routledge.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/compass.v4i8.99


  • There are currently no refbacks.