Using virtual and physical learning spaces to develop a successful mathematical learning community, both for on-site and distance provision

Belinda Huntley, Andrew Middleton, Jeff Waldock

Abstract


This paper considers learning space and its relationship to student belonging and becoming. Student engagement, satisfaction and academic success are outcomes of a supportive learning community which can flourish in a culture of expectation and behaviour created by providing suitable support structures and by considering the effective use of physical and virtual learning spaces. We describe our innovative use of discipline-specific virtual and physical spaces to develop successful mathematical learning communities, in both a UK university where activities are principally face-to-face, and at a South African university where they are mainly virtual. By comparing our practices and spaces, we explore the ‘equivalence of place’ and the roles of academic staff in fostering the development of professional learner identities through each context. Based on evidence from our respective practices, we make recommendations for designing new learning spaces and for making effective use of existing learning spaces. Although this study focuses on mathematics, many of these suggestions can benefit all disciplines.


Keywords


Physical and virtual learning space; mathematical learning communities;place; student engagement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Borba, M., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S. and Aguila, M., 2016. Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education – a survey for ICME-13. [video] Available at: https://lecture2go.uni-hamburg.de/l2go/-/get/v/19773 [Accessed 25 May 2019].

Boys, J., 2010. Towards creative learning spaces: Re-thinking the architecture of post-compulsory education. London: Routledge.

Brown, M., Macrae, S., Rodd, M. and William, D., 2005. Full report of research activities and results: Students’ experiences of undergraduate mathematics; King’s College London Department of Educational and Professional Studies. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258423334_Full_report_of_research_activities_and_results_Students’_experiences_of_undergraduate_mathematics [Accessed 25 May 2019].

Chism, N.V.N., 2006. Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces, In: D. G. Oblinger, ed. Learning Spaces. Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE. Ch. 2.

Cornock, C., 2016. The evaluation of an undergraduate peer assisted learning scheme at Sheffield Hallam University. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. Special Edition: Academic Peer Learning (Part II). Available at: https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/viewFile/360/pdf [Accessed 25 May 2019].

Cornock, C., 2015. Maths Arcade at Sheffield Hallam University: Developments made in a new space. MSOR Connections, 14(1), pp.54-61. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v14i1.253

Croft, T. and Grove, M., 2015. Progression within mathematics degree programmes. In M. Grove, T. Croft, J. Kyle, and D. Lawson, eds. Transitions in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham and Higher Education Academy. pp.173-190.

Dobbs, R. R., Waid. C. A. and del Carmen, A., 2009. Students’ Perceptions of Online Courses: The Effect of Online Course Experience. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), pp.9-26.

Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P. and Tejeda, C., 1999. Re-thinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), pp.286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733

Harrop, D. and Turpin, B., 2013. A Study Exploring Learners' Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), pp.58-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961

Healey, M., Flint, A. and Harrington, K., 2014. Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: The Higher Education Academy.

Huntley, B., 2019. Tertiary mathematics in a digital open distance learning environment. In: D. Singh and M. Makhanya, eds. Essays in online education. pp 156 - 169. World Conference on online learning. ICDE 2017.

Lefevre, M., 2005. Facilitating Practice Learning and Assessment: The Influence of Relationship. Social Work Education, 24(5), pp.565-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500132806

Mannarini, T., Rochira, A. and Talò, C., 2012. Identification processes and inter-community relationships affect sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 40, pp.951-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21504

Middleton, A., 2018. Reimagining spaces for learning in higher education. London: Red Globe Press.

Monahan, T., 2002. Flexible Space & Built Pedagogy: Emerging IT Embodiments. Inventio, 4(1), pp.1-19.

Morris, S., 2017. Critical Pedagogy and Learning Online. Available at: https://www.seanmichaelmorris.com/critical-pedagogy-and-learning-online/ [Accessed 25 May 2019].

Neary, M., Harrison, A., Crellin, G., Parekh, N., Saunders, G. and Duggan, F., 2010. Learning landscapes in higher education: Clearing pathways, making spaces, involving academics in the leadership, governance and management of academic spaces in higher education. Lincoln: Centre for Educational Research and Development.

Oldenburg, R., 1989. The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House.

O’Rourke, V. and Baldwin, C., 2016. Student engagement in placemaking at an Australian university campus. Australian Planner, 53(2) pp.103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1135810

Prinsloo, P., 2009. Modelling throughput at Unisa: The key to the successful implementation of ODL. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/6035 [Accessed 25 May 2019].

Scott-Webber, L., 2004. In Sync – Environmental behaviour research and the design of learning spaces. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.

Suanpang, S., Petocz, P. and Kalceff, W., 2004. Student attitudes to learning business statistics online vs traditional methods. Educational Technology and Society, 7(3), pp.9-20.

Waldock, J., 2011a. Peer Assisted Learning. In: J. Waldock, ed. Developing Graduate Skills in HE Mathematics Programmes - Case Studies of Successful Practice. Birmingham: MSOR Network. pp.22-23.

Waldock, J., 2011b. Progress Files. In: J. Waldock, ed. Developing Graduate Skills in HE Mathematics Programmes - Case Studies of Successful Practice. Birmingham: MSOR Network. pp.24-25.

Waldock, J., 2015. Designing and using informal learning spaces to enhance student engagement with mathematical sciences. MSOR Connections, 14(1), pp.18-27. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v14i1.235

Waldock, J., Rowlett, P., Cornock, C., Robinson, M. and Bartholomew, H., 2017. The role of informal learning spaces in enhancing student engagement with mathematical sciences, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), pp.587-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262470

Zepke, N. and Leach, L., 2010. Improving student engagement: ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), pp.167-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v18i1.1023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.