Email this article 
Post a Comment Key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the key factors for designing and delivering an effective asynchronous professional learning experience. This research study was developed with 107 participants in a module of a Postgraduate Certificate in Academic Practice (PGCAP) - a qualification which is offered to new academics at a United Kingdom (UK) Russell Group university, in line with practice at many other UK higher education institutions (HEIs).
The module design was led by a range of factors which the relevant literature deems important for ensuring successful asynchronous online learning design. A questionnaire was created to measure participants’ overall perceptions regarding efficiency (learning context, facilitation, tutor feedback, peer feedback) and gains (presence, participation, persistence, connectedness, sense of community, learning experience). Participants were also invited to refer to the extent to which peer collaboration contributed to learning, to how far they felt part of a community on the module and to whether the asynchronous learning approach facilitated learning.
Our results both confirmed and contradicted the positive findings of the literature: respectively, our participants did indeed find that many of the asynchronous design factors led, for them, to successful learning; they also identified some of the factors (e.g., peer feedback) as more challenging. We discuss the results of our study in terms of the effectiveness of this range of factors, considering the specific context of our module; we raise relevant questions about the issues and dilemmas involved in designing and delivering asynchronous learning courses when participants have a dual role as both learners and teachers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akyol, Z. and Garrison, D.R. (2011) ‘Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry.’ Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183-190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Akyol, Z. and Garrison, D.R. (2011) ‘Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning.’ British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 233-250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Annand, D. (2011) ‘Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework.’ International Review of Social and Distributed Research, 12(5). Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/924/1855 (Accessed: 03 April 2020).
Baughan, P., Lindsay, S. and Parker, P. (2015) ‘Common themes and missing pieces: the educational value of postgraduate teaching development programmes.’ Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(11). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v7i11.213 (Accessed: 09 November 2022).
Bliss, C. and Lawrence, B. (2019) ‘From Posts to Patterns: A Metric to Characterize Discussion Board Activity in Online Courses.’ Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i2.1665 (Accessed: 27 October 2020).
Boud, D. (2001) ‘Peer learning and assessment.’ In: Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. (eds.) Peer learning in higher education (1st ed.) London: Kogan Page Limited, 67–84. ISBN: 9781315042565
Carr, S. (2000) ‘As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students.’ Chronicle of Higher Education, A39 –A41. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/article/As-Distance-Education-Comes-of/14334 (Accessed: 04 April 2019).
Chalmers, D. and Gardiner, D. (2015) ‘An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programmes.’ Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 81-91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.002 (Accessed: 30 April 2020).
Clarke, L. and Bartholomew, A. (2014) ‘Digging Beneath the Surface: Analyzing the Complexity of Instructors' Participation in Asynchronous Discussion.’ Online Learning, 18(3). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.414 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Olden, D. and Dresel, M. (2021) ‘Academics’ motivations in professional training courses: effects on learning engagement and learning gains.’ International Journal for Academic Development, 26(1), 7-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1768396 (Accessed: 23 June 2022).
DeNoyelles, A., Zydney, J. and Chen, B. (2014) ‘Strategies for creating a community of inquiry through online asynchronous discussions.’ Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 153-165. Available at: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/denoyelles_0314.pdf (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Ertmer, P., Richardson, J., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G. and Mong, C. (2007) ‘Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study.’ Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412-433.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00331.x (Accessed: 30 October 2019).
Evans, S., Knight, T., Sønderlund, A. and Tooley, G. (2014) ‘Facilitators’ experience of delivering asynchronous and synchronous online interprofessional education.’ Medical Teacher, 36(12), 1051-1056. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.918254 (Accessed: 02 October 2019).
Fabriz, S., Hansen, M., Heckmann, C., Mordel, J., Mendzheritskaya, J., Stehle, S. and Horz, H. (2021) ‘How a professional development programme for university teachers impacts their teaching-related self-efficacy, self-concept, and subjective knowledge.’ Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 738-752. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1787957 (Accessed: 09 November 2022).
Fuller, S. (2022) ‘Building communities of practice in distance learning courses for higher education teacher development.’ Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 15(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v15i1.1249 (Accessed: 07 December 2022).
Garrison, R. (2006) ‘Online collaboration principles.’ Online Learning, 10(1), 25-34.
Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1768 (Accessed: 30 October 2019).
Garrison, R. and Arbaugh, J. (2007) ‘Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. Available at: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001 (Accessed: 30 October 2019).
Garrison, D., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000) ‘Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 (Accessed: 30 October 2019).
Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P. and Wells, J. (2019) ‘Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community.’ Online Learning, 11(2).
Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i2.1724 (Accessed: 07 December 2022).
Kent, C., Laslo, E. and Rafaeli, S. (2016) ‘Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes.’ Computers & Education, 97, 116-128. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Liu N. and Carless, D. (2006) ‘Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.’ Teaching in Higher Education. 11(3), 279-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Lynch, R., McNamara P. and Seery N. (2012) ‘Promoting Deep Learning in a Teacher Education Programme through Self- and Peer-Assessment and Feedback.’ European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 179-97. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.643396 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Macià, M. and Garcia, I. (2016) ‘Informal Online Communities and Networks as a Source of Teacher Professional Development: A Review.’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
McConlogue, T. (2015) ‘Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback.’ Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495-1506.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.868878 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. and Jones, K. (2010) Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington: US Department of Education. Available at:
https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
(Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Miers M., Clarke, B., Pollard, K., Rickaby, C., Thomas, J. and Turtle, A. (2007) ‘Online interprofessional learning: The student experience.’ Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(5), 529-542. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820701585296 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Moon, J. (1999) ‘Reflection in higher education learning: Working Paper 4.’ Learning and Teaching Support Network. Available at: https://nursing-midwifery.tcd.ie/assets/director-staff-edu-dev/pdf/PD-%20Working-Paper-4-Moon.pdf (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Moore, M., and Kearsley, G. (1996) Distance education: a systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ISBN: 1111520992
Muammar, O.M. and Alkathiri, M.S. (2022) ‘What really matters to faculty members attending professional development programs in higher education.’ International Journal for Academic Development, 27(3), 221-23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1897987 (Accessed:15 January 2023).
Nicol, D., Thomson, A. and Breslin, C. (2014) ‘Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective.’ Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Noben, I., Deinum, J.F., Douwes-van Ark, I.M., & Hofman, W.A. (2021) ‘How is a professional development programme related to the development of university teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and teaching conceptions?’ Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100966 (Accessed: 15 January 2023)
Northey, G., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M. and Govind, R. (2015) ‘Increasing student engagement using asynchronous learning.’ Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 171-180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475315589814 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Peacock, S. and Cowan, J. (2019) ‘Promoting sense of belonging in online learning communities of inquiry at accredited courses.’ Online Learning, 23(2), 67-81. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1488 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Peacock, S. and Cowan, J. (2016) ‘From Presences to Linked Influences Within Communities of Inquiry.’ International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(5), 267-283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2602 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Picciano, A. (2002) ‘Beyond student perceptions: issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course.’ Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 6(1), 21-40. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Rovai, A. (2002a) ‘Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Rovai, A. (2002b) ‘A preliminary look at structural differences in sense of classroom community between higher education traditional and ALN courses.’ Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41-56. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1871 (Accessed: 30 October 2021 ).
Rovai, A. (2002c) ‘Development of an instrument to measure classroom community.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197-211. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Rovai, A. (2000) ‘Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks.’
Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285-297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00037-9 (Accessed: 03 April 2019 ).
Rourke, L. and Kanuka, H. (2009) ‘Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature.’ Journal of Distance Education, 23, 19-47. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ836030 (Accessed: 12 October 2021).
Sadler, D. (2010) ‘Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal.’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535-550.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Shea, P. (2006) ‘A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments.’ Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 35-44. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i1.1774 (Accessed: 30 October 2021)..
Shea, P., Li, C. and Pickett, A. (2006) ‘A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses.’ The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175-190. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005 (Accessed: 30 October 2021).
Song, L. and McNary, S. (2011) ‘Understanding students' online interaction: analysis of discussion board postings.’ Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(1), 1-14. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/109405/ (Accessed: 12 October 2019).
Swan, K., Garrison, D. and Richardson, J.C. (2009) ‘A Constructivist Approach to Online Learning: The Community of Inquiry Framework.’ In: Payne, C. (ed.) Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks IGI Global, 43-57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch004 (Accessed: 03 April 2019).
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H. and Fung, I. (2007) Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. ISBN: 978079032628 3
Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I. and Elliot, A. (2000) ‘Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students.’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428 (Accessed:12 October 2021).
Waterston, R. (2011) ‘Interaction in online interprofessional education case discussions.’ Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(4), 272-279. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.566647 (Accessed: 03 April 2019)
Zhu, E. (2006) ‘Interaction and cognitive engagement: an analysis of four asynchronous online discussions.’ Instructional Science, 34(6), 451-480. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0 (Accessed: 12 October 2021).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v16i1.1392
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Cabral, Steph Fuller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.