Improving reading compliance with whole class qualitative quiz questions

Arron Phillips, Martin Compton

Abstract


“Have you done your reading?” If you are a teaching academic that always gets positive responses to this question then you are in a very fortunate (or talented) minority. This small case study draws on existing research into why students do not read and evaluations of strategies designed to combat this phenomenon. It reflects on an ad hoc trial of randomly targeted quiz questions to two seminar groups of first year undergraduates within the Business Faculty. The trial spanned seven weeks and sought to improve previously poor levels of reading compliance. The study found that, within a short period, the technique employed significantly increased levels of reading compliance measured across the whole group through qualitative comprehension questions. 


Keywords


reading, compliance, study skills, business, pedagogy, quizzes, engagement, motivation, teaching strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burchfield, C. M. and Sappington, J. (2000) ‘Compliance with Required Reading Assignments.’ Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 58-60.

Brost, B. D. and Bradley, K. A. (2006) ‘Student Compliance with Assigned Reading: A Case Study.’ Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 101-111.

Clump, M. A., Bauer, H. and Breadley, C. (2004) ‘The extent to which psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum.’ Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 227-232.

Cottrell, S. (2013) The study skills handbook (4th edn.). Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hatteberg, S. J. and Steffy, K. (2013) ‘Increasing Reading Compliance of Undergraduates: An Evaluation of Compliance Methods.’ Teaching Sociology, 41(4), 346–52.

Hoeft, M. E. (2012) ‘Why university students don't read: What professors can do to increase compliance.’ International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 12.

Jolliffe, D. A. and Harl, A. (2008) ‘Texts of our institutional lives: Studying the ‘reading transition’ from high school to college: What are our students reading and why?’ College English, 70(6), 599-617.

Johnson, B. C. and Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009) ‘The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in an undergraduate social psychology course.’ Teaching of Psychology, 36(1), 33-37.

Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E. and Herschbach, T. R. (2010) ‘Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives.’ College Student Journal, 44(2), 219.

Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., Irvine, A., Malmström, H. and Mežek, Š. (2012) ‘Reading in tertiary education: Undergraduate student practices and attitudes.’ Quality in Higher Education, 18(2), 235-256.

Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2015) Higher Education Review of University of Greenwich. Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/ReviewsAndReports/Documents/University%20of%20Greenwich/University-of-Greenwich-HER-15.pdf (Accessed: 26 April 2016).

Quaye, S. J. and Harper, S. R. (2014) Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. London: Routledge.

Roberts, J. and Roberts, K. (2008) ‘Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning.’ Teaching Sociology 36(2), 125-40.

Sappington, J., Kinsey, K. and Munsayac, K. (2002) ‘Two studies of reading compliance among college students.’ Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), 272-274.

Schrank, Z. (2016) ‘An Assessment of Student Perceptions and Responses to Frequent Low-stakes Testing in Introductory Sociology Classes.’ Teaching Sociology, 44(2), 118–127.

Starcher, K. and Proffitt, D. (2011) ‘Encouraging Students to Read: What professors are (and aren't) doing about it. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 396-407.

Tuckman, B. (1991) ‘Motivating college students: A model based on empirical evidence.’ Innovative Higher Education, 15(2), 167-176.

Uskul, A. K. and Eaton, J. (2005) ‘Using graded questions to increase timely reading of assigned material.’ Teaching of Psychology, 32(2), 116-118.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/compass.v9i13.335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments