Students’ Perceptions of Enhanced e-Assessment Feedback Addressing Common Student Errors in Mathematics

Authors

  • Indunil Sikurajapathi University of the West of England, Bristol https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-5320
  • Karen Henderson University of the West of England, Bristol
  • Rhys Gwynllyw University of the West of England, Bristol

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v19i2.1236

Keywords:

e-assessment, Dewis e-Assessment system, Common Student Errors, enhanced feedback

Abstract

The Common Student Errors Project (CSE Project) has been running at the University of the West of England (UWE, Bristol) since 2017. The main aim of this project is to introduce a method to detect CSEs and to provide tailored feedback in Engineering Mathematics e-Assessment questions. In this case study we briefly describe the process of collecting CSEs related to Engineering Mathematics and delivering personalised enhanced feedback to students who made CSEs on Dewis eAssessment questions. We then present how we carried out a questionnaire to gather student perceptions on the enhanced feedback they received. Finally, we present the outcomes of the questionnaire data, the conclusions on students’ perceptions of the current enhanced feedback and ascertain possible future directions for further development of the enhanced feedback.

Author Biographies

Indunil Sikurajapathi, University of the West of England, Bristol

Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsLecturer (Graduate Tutor) in Mathematics 

Karen Henderson, University of the West of England, Bristol

Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsAssociate Professor - TEL

Rhys Gwynllyw, University of the West of England, Bristol

Department of Engineering Design and MathematicsAssociate Professor - Learning and Teaching (Mathematics)

References

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp.77–101.

Castleberry, A. and Nolen, A., 2018. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 10, pp. 807–815.

CSE Project at UWE (2019). CSE Project: Participant Information Sheet. Available at: https://fetstudy.uwe.ac.uk/~bin-sikurajapa/dewis/cseproject/docs/Participant_Information_Sheet.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2020].

Dillman, D., 2007. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method: 2007 update with new internet, visual and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., 1996. Research methods in the social sciences. 5th ed. London: Arnold.

Gwynllyw, R. and Henderson, K., 2009. DEWIS: a computer aided assessment system for mathematics and statistics. CETL-MSOR 2008 Conference Proceedings. pp. 38-44.

Gwynllyw, R. and Henderson, K., 2012. “Intelligent marking in summative e-assessmentâ€. In: Proc. HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference.

Oppenheim, A. N., 1992. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. 2nd ed. London: Pinter Publications.

Qualtrics, 2005. Qualtrics (2019) [computer program]. Available from: https://www.qualtrics.com [Accessed 01 March 2021].

Rees, R. and Barr, G., 1984. Diagnosis and Prescription in the Classroom: Some Common Maths Problems. London: Harper & Row.

Sikurajapathi, I., Henderson, K., and Gwynllyw, R., 2020. Using E-Assessment to Address Mathematical Misconceptions in Engineering Students. International Journal of Information and

Education Technology. 10(5), pp.356–361.

Sleeman, D., 1984. “Mis-generalization: An Explanation of Observed Mal-rules.†In: Proc. The Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01