“It’s so unfair” – Can we increase student perceptions of equity in the grading of group assessments by allowing them to declare a distribution of workload?





group assessment, equity, anxiety, inclusivity


One of the most common complaints from students about taking part in group work is that the efforts of those who make the largest contribution are not rewarded fairly. One possible way to combat this is to allow students to agree on and declare a contribution split when submitting group projects, in the knowledge that their grades will be adjusted accordingly. We consider the results of a survey among students who have experienced group work graded both under this format and the standard “everyone in the group gets the same grade†approach. Quantitative analysis reveals that, in general, students may prefer the declaration of workload split approach. However, a closer analysis of free-text comments showed that feelings are often more nuanced than positive or negative. Students with social anxieties seem to be particularly conflicted by this method of assessment, with many reporting feelings of appreciation at the perception that their work is rewarded more fairly, concurrent with heightened stress and anxiety at the idea of approaching the conversation around workload split with their peers.

Author Biography

Laurence Matthew Shaw, Nottingham Trent University

Laurence Shaw is a Senior Lecturer in Mathematics in the School of Science and Technology at Nottingham Trent University


Abelson, M. A., and J. A. Babcock., 1985. Peer Evaluation within Group Projects: A Suggested Mechanism and Process. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 10(4), pp.98–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298601000412

Aggarwal, P., and O’Brien, C. L., 2008. Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), pp.255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283

CBI, 2017. Helping the UK Thrive: CBI/Pearson Education and Skills Survey 2017. London: Confederation of British Industry. Available from: https://www.cbi.org.uk/media/1341/helping-the-uk-to-thrive-tess-2017.pdf

Gransberg, D., 2010. Quantifying the Impact of Peer Evaluations on Student Team Project Grading. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(1), pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771003590326.

Hall, D., and Buzwell, S., 2013. The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), pp. 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123.

Jin, X-H., 2012. A comparative study of effectiveness of peer assessment of individuals’ contributions to group projects in undergraduate construction management core units. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), pp.577-589, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557147.

Kornelakis, A. and Petrakaki, D., 2020. Embedding employability skills in UK higher education: Between digitalization and marketization. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), pp.290–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220902978.

Laal, M. and Ghodsi, S.M., 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, pp. 486-490 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.

Planas-Lladó, A., Feliu, L, Castro, F., Fraguell, R. M., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., Suñol, J. J., and Daunis-i-Estadella, P., 2018. Using peer assessment to evaluate teamwork from a multidisciplinary perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, pp.14-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1274369

Topping, K., 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, pp.249-276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249.

Victoria, M. F., 2020. Types of peer assessments in group projects. In Sanderson, L. and Stone, S. Proceedings of 2020 Teaching-learning-research: design and environments, 2-4 December 2020, Manchester, UK. AMPS proceedings series, 22.2. Manchester: AMPS [online], Chapter 5, pp.49-58. Available from: https://amps-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Amps-Proceedings-Series-22.2.pdf.