Authentic By Design: developing mathematicians for the talent economy

Authors

  • Brendan Masterson Department of Design Engineering and Mathematics, Middlesex University London https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-1349
  • Matthew Jones School of Management, University College London
  • Alison Megeney Department of Design Engineering and Mathematics, Middlesex University
  • Nicholas Sharples Department of Design Engineering and Mathematics, Middlesex University
  • Snezana Lawrence Department of Design Engineering and Mathematics, Middlesex University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v21i2.1400

Abstract

The graduate skills expected of mathematics students from employers has changed dramatically over the past decade. Increasingly maths graduates are expected to have communication, creative, programming and teamwork skills in addition to the problem solving and critical thinking skills traditionally sought by employers from mathematics graduates. In this paper we will outline how the Middlesex University undergraduate mathematics programme was designed to enhance students’ communication, creativity and programming skills while maintaining the mathematical rigour that unpins all maths programmes.

References

Bransford, J.D., and Stein, B.S., 1993. The IDEAL Problem Solver: Guide for improving Thinking Learning and Creativity. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.

Freudenthal, H., 1968. Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1), pp. 3-8. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3481973 [Accessed 8 November 2022].

Freudenthal, H., 1973. Mathematics as an Educational Task. Dordrecht: Springer.

Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiaens, T.J., and Kirschner, P.A., 2004. A Five Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment, Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), pp.67-86.

Jones, F.B., 1977. The Moore Method. The American Mathematical Monthly, 84(4), pp.273-278.

Jones, M., and Megeney, A., 2019. Thematic problem solving: A case study on an approach to teaching problem solving in undergraduate mathematics. MSOR Connections, 17(2), pp. 54-59. https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v17i2.978

Lakatos, I., 1976. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press.

Mason, J., Burton, L., and Stacey, K., 2010. Thinking Mathematically (2nd Ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

Office for Students. Access and Participation Data Dashboard. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/data-and-analysis/access-and-participation-data-dashboard/ [Accessed 30 November 2022].

Pitt, E. and Quinlan, K., 2022. Impacts of Higher Education Assessment and Feedback Policy and Practice on Students: a review of the literature 2016 – 2022. Advance HE.

Polya, G., 1957. How to Solve It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Prospects, 2022. Available at: https://www.prospects.ac.uk/careers-advice/what-can-i-do-with-my-degree/mathematics [Accessed 25 November 2022].

Sharples, N., 2021, LIDAR github repository, Available at: https://github.com/nicholassharples/LIDAR [Accessed 25 November 2022].

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31