Talking Statistics: A reflection on some of the problems with statistical language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v22i3.1476Keywords:
Statistics, LanguageAbstract
For most of my life I managed to swerve statistics. I learned a little at school and studied some (very theoretical) statistics as part of my mathematics degree. As a teacher, in schools and then university, I did not teach anything beyond GCSE statistics. It was not until I got a post in Mathematics and Statistics support a decade ago that I had to begin to learn the subject properly.I had excellent support from the sigma network, attending a memorable SPSS Bootcamp and other events which helped me enormously. But I was conscious that there were various aspects of statistics that presented problems for me. One was the way in which statistics differed from mathematics in being much less cut and dried. If a student had made a mistake in a calculation or argument it was fairly easy to spot and correct. However, when a student said ‘my supervisor said I should do a t-test’ and this did not seem the most appropriate way forward it was much harder to advise. I also realised that I was finding the language of statistics harder to master than I felt it ought to have been. It is this aspect that I will focus on in this article as I tentatively suggest that students might also have such problems.References
Dunn, P.K., Carey, M.D., Richardson, A.M. and McDonald, C. (2016). Learning the language of statistics: Challenges and Teaching Approaches. Statistics Education Research Journal, 15(1), pp.8-27. Available at: http://iase-web.org/Publications.php?p=SERJ [Accessed 7 November 2023].
Graves, H., Moghaddasi, S. and Hashim, A. (2014). “Let G=(V, E) be a graphâ€: Turning the abstract into the tangible in introductions in mathematics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 36, pp.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.03.004
Kaplan, J., Rogness, N.T. and Fisher, D.G. (2010). Lexical Ambiguity in Statistics: How Students Use and Define the words: Association, Average, Confidence, Random and Spread. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(2), pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2010.11889491
Kaplan, J., Rogness, N.T. and Fisher, D.G. (2011). Lexical Ambiguity: making the case against spread. Teaching Statistics, 34(2), pp.56-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2011.00477.x
Kaplan, J., Rogness, N.T. and Fisher, D.G. (2014). Exploiting lexical ambiguity to help students understand the meaning of random. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(1), pp.9-24. Available at: http://iase-web.org/Publications.php?p=SERJ [Accessed 7 November 2023].
Kaplan, J. and Rogness, N.T. (2018). Increasing Statistical Literacy by Exploiting Lexical Ambiguity of Technical Terms. Numeracy, 11(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.11.1.3
Lavy, L. and Mashiach-Eizenberg, M. (2009). The Interplay Between Spoken Language and Informal Definitions of Statistical Concepts. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889502
Martin, J. (2010). Language, register and genre. In C. Coffin, T. Lillis and K. O’Halloran, eds. Applied Linguistics Methods: a Reader. London: Routledge in association with the Open University, pp.12-32.
Mason, J. and Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004). Fundamental Constructs in Mathematics Education, Abingdon: RoutledgeFarmer.
Mason, R. and Just, M.A. (2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, pp.115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076
McConway, K. (2016). More confusing terms in statistics. Open Learn. Available at: https://www.open.edu/openlearn/course/view.php?id=12784 [Accessed 7 November 2023].
Morgan, C. (2005). Words, Definitions and Concepts in Discourses of Mathematics, Teaching and Learning. Language and Education, 19(2), pp.103-117. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1564242/ [Accessed 7 November 2023].
Rangecroft, M. (2002). The Language of Statistics. Teaching Statistics, 24(2), pp.34-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9639.00080
Rector, M.A., Nehm, R.H. and Pearl, D. (2013). Learning the Language of Evolution: Lexical Ambiguity and Word Meaning in Student Explanations. Research in Science Education, 43, pp.1107-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z
UCL (2020). UCL denames buildings named after eugenicists. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2020/jun/ucl-denames-buildings-named-after-eugenicists [Accessed 1 November 2023].
