Towards practical learning using air quality monitors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v22i2.1478Abstract
In this study, we explore the use of a low-cost air quality monitor as an experiment within a first year undergraduate statistics setting. The aim is to enhance student engagement and to provide a basis for both individual and group assessments. A pilot, during the summer months of June-September 2023, involved 52 volunteer students who collected indoor and outdoor air quality data. The students shared their data and analytical insights. “Fun/enjoyment†was frequently mentioned in student feedback, suggesting this practical approach may improve student engagement.References
Aliaga, M. et al. (2012). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) college report. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/2005GaiseCollege_Full.pdf [Accessed 3 April 2024].
CERC (Cambridge Environmental research Consultants) (2021). D9.1 Final Report: Breathe London Project. Available at: https://globalcleanair.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/95/files//2021/02/BL-CERC-Final-Report.pdf [Accessed 3 April 2024].
Engel-Cox, J., Nguyen, T.K.O., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R.V. and Zell, E. (2013). Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: Particulate Matter. Atmospheric Environment, 80, pp.584-590, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.016.
EEA (European Environment Agency) (2019). Assessing air quality through citizen science. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/assessing-air-quality-through-citizen-science/at_download/file [Accessed 3 April 2024].
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), pp.8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Jones, E. and Palmer, T. (2022) Review of group-based methods for teaching statistics in higher education. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 41(1), pp.69-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab002
Lucas, B. and Hanson, J. (2021). Reimagining practical learning in secondary schools: A review of the evidence. London: Royal Academy of Engineering. Available at: https://raeng.org.uk/media/l41dfxrr/rae-practical-learning-report_final.pdf [Accessed 3 April 2024].
Lugosi, E. and Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), pp.403-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555
Nguyen, K.A. et al. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00270-7
Theobald, E. J. et al. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
