Creating authentic assessment in mathematics

Ria Symonds, Lisa Mott

Abstract


Assessment of students’ mathematics knowledge within higher education (HE) has normally taken a very traditional approach. Closed-book assessments have long been the favoured mode of assessment (Iannone & Simpson, 2011) which often requires students to recall facts, formulae, and methods. One could argue that this type of assessment is limited in its ability to effectively assess how well a student’s ability to authentically use mathematics has developed. Due to the recent pandemic, many institutions were forced to rethink their assessment methods so that they could be delivered online and remotely. As such, there has been a renewed sense of need for more ‘authentic’ assessments for mathematics-based programmes.

In this paper, we will discuss our journey of creating more authentic assessments for apprentices enrolled on a new Data Science Degree Apprenticeship, particularly in mathematics/statistics. We will compare two years of delivery of the course; the first year of delivery which comprised of traditional assessment methods (coursework/exam) and the second year of delivery that used more authentic assessment methods. We will discuss the pros and cons of each model by reflecting on our practice and drawing on apprentices’ feedback.


Keywords


authentic, traditional, assessment, mathematics, statistics, apprentices.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Gibson, K. and Shaw, C.M. (2011). Assessment of Active Learning. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.120

Hall, D. and Buzwell, S. (2012). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467123

Iannone, P. and Simpson, A. (2011). The summative assessment diet: how we assess in mathematics degrees. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 30(4), pp.186-196, https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrr017

Lam, B.H. (2013). Authentic Learning. Available at: https://www.eduhk.hk/aclass/Theories/AuthenticLearning_28June.pdf [Accessed 8 November 2023].

Niss, M.A. (1998). Dimensions of geometry and assessment. In C. Mammana and V. Villani (Eds.), Perspective on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century: An ICMI Study, pp.263-274. Springer Netherlands.

Pellegrino J.W., Chudowsky N. and Glaser R. (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), pp.433-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P. and Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2023). Assessment for inclusion: rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design, Higher Education Research & Development, 42(2), pp.483-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v22i2.1484

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.