Making the grade: supporting mathematics students in understanding the use of grade-based marking criteria for assessments

Ewan Russell

Abstract


Grade-based marking criteria are used widely in humanities subjects, and also in some areas of the sciences. In many mathematics assessments, individual marks are clearly allocated for specific elements of working in calculations, computations or theoretical arguments. This case study will document the use of grade-based marking criteria for assessments in a final year mathematics module at a mainstream UK university. The module has the development of professional skills for mathematics as the central focus and the assessment tasks take the form of written reports and oral presentations. This paper will describe formative group tasks set in the initials weeks of the module to introduce students to the grade-based marking criteria, and to provide students with experience of using the criteria themselves. The success of these initiatives in developing student appreciation for the use of the assessment criteria will be discussed, along with ideas for the future based on student responses to the activities.


Keywords


Assessment; marking criteria; peer learning; group exercises; project work

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, M., Brown, R, and Mesher, L., 2018. Engaging students with assessment and feedback: improving satisfaction with students as co-designers. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.32-46. Available at:

http://insight.cumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/3840/1/Andrews_EngagingStudents.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2019].

Chadwick, E., Sandicroft, K., and Percy, D., 2011. Assessing student teams developing mathematical models applied to business and industrial mathematics. MSOR Connections, 11(3), pp.22-24.

Cranmer, S., 2006. Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp.169-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572041.

Office for Students, 2018. Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework Year Four Procedural Guidance. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/da96d15a-97e6-4732-a2f5-cb2473633932/ofs2018_45.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2019].

Pegg, A., Waldock, J., Hendy-Isaac, S., and Lawton, R., 2012. Pedagogy for employability. Higher Education Academy.

Robinson, M., 2015. Providing effective feedback. In: Grove, M. et al., eds. Transitions in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, University of Birmingham, pp.159-172.

Sadler, D.R., 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp.175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264262.

Schinske, J., and Tanner, K., 2014. Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently). CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(2), pp.159-166. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.CBE-14-03-0054.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v17i2.962

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.