Using Incoming Data to Monitor Engagement and Inform Mathematics Support Interventions

Ioannis Lignos

Abstract


Students who do not engage enough with their studies could place themselves at risk of underperforming or failing. Such a risk may be higher for students who are assessed in one or more mathematics modules and lack the appropriate background knowledge, or do not engage enough with related teaching activities. It has been shown for students who engage with mathematics support, there is a significant impact on student performance and progression in the relevant modules. Thus, improving the mechanisms of engagement with mathematics support should be a priority for any student success strategy.

We discuss the monitoring of attendance and performance data of first-year engineering students, as it becomes available, in order to inform interventions which suit the observed student behaviour best. Specifically, the method described was used with first-year engineering students at the University of East London (UEL) during the 2017-8 academic year. We find that when monitoring processes are applied to an already tailored support package, they can often help maintain engagement levels, understand why some students do not engage, and prompt us to differentiate support further.


Keywords


student engagement; data-driven interventions; mathematics support; retention

Full Text:

Remote PDF

References


Berry E., Mac an Bhaird, C. and O’Shea, A., 2015. Investigating the relationships between the usage of Mathematics Learning Support and performance of at-risk students. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 34 (4), pp. 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv005

Burke, G., Mac an Bhaird, C., and O’Shea, A., 2012. Peer mentoring for at-risk students. In P. Rowlett and D. Waller, ed. Proceedings of the CETL-MSOR Conference 2012. University of Sheffield, 12-13 July. Birmingham: The Maths, Stats & OR Network. pp.9-14. Available at: http://www.sigma-network.ac.uk/cetl-msor/archive-of-cetl-msor-conference-proceedings-2006-2012/

Burke, G., Mac an Bhaird, C., and O’Shea, A., 2013. The Effect of a Monitoring Scheme on Tutorial Attendance and Assignment Submission. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44 (4), pp. 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.756553

Dzator M. and Dzator J., 2018. The impact of mathematics and statistics support at the Academic Learning Centre, Central Queensland University. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry016

Fuller, M., Wilson, M., and Tobin R., 2011. The national survey of student engagement as a predictor of undergraduate GPA: a cross‐sectional and longitudinal examination. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (6), pp. 735-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.488791

Gallimore M. and Stewart, J., 2014. Increasing the impact of mathematics support on aiding student transition in higher education. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 33 (2), pp. 98-109. https:// doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hru008

Grehan, M., Mac an Bhaird, C. and O’Shea, A., 2016. Investigating students’ levels of engagement with mathematics: critical events, motivations, and influences on behaviour. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47 (1), pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0020739X.2015.1050706

Jacob M. and Ni Fhloinn, E., 2018. A quantitative, longitudinal analysis of the impact of mathematics support in an Irish University. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry012

Lee S., Harrison M.C., Pell, G. and Robinson, C.L., 2008. Predicting performance of first year engineering students and the importance of assessment tools therein. Engineering Education, 3(1), pp. 44-51. https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2008.03010044

Mac an Bhaird, C., Morgan, T. and O’Shea, A., 2009. The impact of the mathematics support centre on the grades of first year students at the National University of Ireland Maynooth. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations, 28 (3), pp. 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrp014

Mac an Bhaird, C., Fitzmaurice, M., Ni Fhloin, E., and O’Sullivan, C., 2013. Student non-engagement with mathematics learning supports. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations, 32(4), pp.191-205. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrt018

McKie, A., 2018. UK gets world-first national learning analytics service. [online] Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-gets-world-first-national-learning-analytics-service [Accessed 19 November 2018]

Millwood, G. and Lignos, I., 2015. Re-pacing mathematics support to transcend the propensity for “cramming”. In: D. Green, ed. CETL-MSOR Conference Proceedings. University of Greenwich, London, 8–9 September. Loughborough University: The sigma Network. pp. 66–73. Available at: http:// www.sigma-network.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CETL-MSOR-2015-Proceedings.pdf

Patel, R. and Rossiter, A., 2009. Student engagement and non-engagement with maths support. In: D. Green, ed. CETL-MSOR Conference Proceedings. Open University, Milton Keynes, 7–8 September. The Maths, Stats, and OR Network. pp. 99–104. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ system/files/proceedings_2009_upload_0.pdf

Pell G. and Croft T., 2008. Mathematics support – support for all? Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations, 27 (3), pp. 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrn015

Rylands, L.J. and Shearman, D., 2018. Mathematics learning support and engagement in first year engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49 (8), pp. 1133-1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1447699

Symonds, R., Lawson, D. and Robinson, C.L., 2008. Promoting student engagement with mathematics support. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applcations, 27 (3), pp. 140-149. https:// doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrn011

Vuori, J., 2014. Student engagement: buzzword or fuzzword. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36 (5), pp. 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.936094




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v17i3.982

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.