An analysis of student reflections of semester projects in introductory statistics courses

Richard Spindler

Abstract


Projects in an introductory statistics course have been implemented for many years as an authentic assessment and learning activity. This article examines student perceptions toward semester projects and the relationship of those perceptions to outcomes. Student semester project data including personal reflections and assessment scores from 254 undergraduate students in six semesters of introductory statistics were analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods, relying heavily on content analysis. The projects comprehensively assessed introductory statistics content, and student reflections were based on three prompts. High levels of learning and interest were reported by the students. Workload issues were not expressed by students to an appreciable degree. Finally, this study illustrates the value of using qualitative methods with case studies to inform teaching and learning.


Keywords


Statistics; Teaching; Project; Qualitative Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Statistical Association, 2016. Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education, (GAISE) College Report. Available at

http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GaiseCollege_Full.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Babbie, E., 2011. The Basics of Social Research (6th Ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

Chance, B., 1997. Experiences with Authentic Assessment Techniques in an Introductory Statistics Course. Journal of Statistics Education, 5(3). Available at

http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/chance.html [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Cobb, G. and Moore, D. 1997. Mathematics, Statistics, and Teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), pp.801-823.

Cobb, G., 2007. The Introductory Statistics Course: A Ptolemaic Curriculum. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). Available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb3k0nz [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Early, M., 2007. Students’ Expectations of Introductory Statistics Instructors. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(1), pp.51-66.

Gal, I. and Ginsburg, L., 1994. The Role of Beliefs and Attitudes in Learning Statistics: Towards an Assessment Framework. Journal of Statistics Education, 2(2). Available at http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v2n2/gal.html [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Garfield, J., 1994. Beyond Testing and Grading: Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning.

Journal of Statistics Education, 2(1). Available at

http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v2n1/garfield.html [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Glaser, B., 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley. CA: Sociology Press.

Jonsson, A., 2014. Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), pp.840-852.

Marshall, E., 2019. Embedding and assessing projected based statistics. MSOR Connections, 17(2), pp.75-82.

Menendez-Varela, J. and Gregori-Giralt, E., 2015. The contribution of rubrics to the validity of performance assessment: a study of the conservation-restoration and design undergraduate degrees. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), pp.228-244.

Moreira da Silva, M. and Pinto, S., 2014. Teaching Statistics Through Learning Projects. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(2), pp.177-186. Available at

https://iase-web.org/documents/SERJ/SERJ13(2)_daSilva.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Neumann, D., Hood, M. and Heumann, M., 2013. Using Real-Life Data When Teaching Statistics: Student Perceptions of this Strategy in an Introductory Statistics Course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 12(2), pp.59-70.

Onwueguzie, A., 2000. Attitudes toward Statistics Assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), pp.321-339.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L. and Brown. S., 1997. ‘But is it fair?’ An Exploratory Study of Student Perceptions of the Consequential Validity of Assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), pp.349-371.

Shekar, A., 2014. Project based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, Indiana. June 2014. Available at https://peer.asee.org/22949 [Accessed 10 January 2020].

Spindler, R., 2019. Aligning Modelling Projects with Bloom’s Taxonomy. PRIMUS, pp.1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1619208

Struyven, K., Dochy, F. and Janssens, S., 2005. Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), pp.325-341.

Suskie, L., 2004. Assessing Student Learning (A Common Sense Guide). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Thorne, S., 2016. Interpretive Description: Qualitative Research for Applied Practice. New York: Routledge.

Zimmerman, B., 1989. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), pp.329–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v18i3.1065

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.