The role of teaching observations: Developing or managing academic practice?

Authors

  • Martin Compton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v8i12.279

Keywords:

teaching, excellence, quality, observation, peer review, peer observation, OTL, TEF, performance, FE, HE

Abstract

Observations of teaching are becoming increasingly common in Higher Education, often as part of a peer observation project, taught teacher education programme or other professional development activity. In the context of the evolving Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), this paper argues that teaching observations can and should play a central role in developing teaching quality but that there needs to be clarity about the value and purpose of them from the start. Drawing on experiences from the Further Education sector,  issues and pitfalls are highlighted that illustrate how a tool for teacher development can become a managerial mechanism for teacher perfromance monitoring whilst also suggesting approaches designed to create a positive engagement with observation by both the observer and the observed.

Author Biography

Martin Compton

Martin Compton is a Senior Lecturer in Teaching, Learning and Professional Development in the Educational Development Unit at the University of Greenwich. He is a Course Leader on the PGCert. in Higher Education and Programme Leader for the Award in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. 

References

Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2008). The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development. Higher Education, 55 (6), 735-752.

Coe, R. (2013). Improving Education. A triumph of hope over experience.

Inaugural Lecture of Professor Robert Coe, Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring, University of Durham, 18 June 2013.

Didau, D. (2014). How can we make classroom observation more effective? [Online]. Available at: http://www.learningspy.co.uk/learning/can-make-classroom-observation-effective/ [Last accessed: 27th October 2015]

Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489-503.

Hendry, G. D., Bell, A., & Thomson, K. (2014). Learning by observing a peer’s teaching situation. International Journal for Academic Development,19 (4), 318-329.

Ho, A.D. and Kane, T. J. (2013). ‘The Reliability of Classroom Observations by School Personnel’. Research Paper. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540957.pdf [Last accessed: 27th October 2015]

Ofsted (2014). Common Inspection Framework 2012: Updated for September 2014. Manchester, Ofsted.

O’Leary, M. (2013a). Surveillance, performativity and normalised practice: the use and impact of graded lesson observations in Further Education colleges. Journal of further and higher education, 37(5), 694-714.

O’Leary, M. (2013b). Developing a National Framework for the Effective Use of Lesson Observation in Further Education. UCU.

Shortland, S. (2004). Peer observation: a tool for staff development or compliance? Journal of further and higher education, 28(2), 219-228.

Yiend, J., Weller, S., & Kinchin, I. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 465-484.

Downloads

Published

05/05/2016

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 12 (2016): Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching

Section

Opinion Pieces

License

Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a more equitable global exchange of knowledge.

 

Works are released under the default licence of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY) licence, which provides unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. If authors require a divergent licence, please contact [happy to have 'the Scholarly Communications Manager' (ks8035h@gre.ac.uk) listed here if that is easier.]

 

Authors of articles published in Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching remain the copyright holders to their published work and grant third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to terms of the Creative Commons license agreement applied to the work by Compass: Journal of Learning & Teaching.

 

Self-archiving policy: authors are permitted, and encouraged, to deposit any version of their article - submitted, accepted, and published versions - in subject and institutional repositories at any time. 

 

If you have any queries about the choice of license, or which to discuss other options, please contact the Scholarly Communications Manager at scholarlycommunications@greenwich.ac.uk.